<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Publication:
Postoperative management of prostate cancer—optimizing prostate cancer care

dc.contributor.coauthorSayan, Mutlay
dc.contributor.coauthorD'Amico, Anthony V.
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.facultymemberNo
dc.contributor.kuauthorTilki, Derya
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-29T09:38:13Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThe current standard-of-care follow-up protocol for patients who have undergone a radical prostatectomy—irrespective of prostatectomy (p) stage, margin status, or Gleason score—is monitoring with an ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test and the initiation of salvage radiation therapy (RT) if the PSA level reaches or exceeds 0.1 ng/mL (to convert PSA to µg/L, multiply by 1). This practice is supported by a meta-analysis of 3 prospective randomized clinical trials (RCTs), which derived its conclusion from examination of the end point of progression-free survival (PFS), primarily influenced by PSA failure. However, it is important to note that the primary end point of the RADICALS-RT trial, the largest of the 3 RCTs included in this meta-analysis, was freedom from distant metastases (FFDM). However, as the other 2 RCTs approached the reporting of their primary end point, being PFS, a decision was made to consolidate the data and evaluate PFS, even though it was a secondary end point in the RADICALS-RT study.
dc.description.fulltextNo
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessN/A
dc.description.peerreviewstatusN/A
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.studentonlypublicationNo
dc.description.studentpublicationNo
dc.description.versionN/A
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ1
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1887
dc.identifier.eissn2374-2445
dc.identifier.embargoN/A
dc.identifier.endpage1170
dc.identifier.issn2374-2437
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.pubmed38990544
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85199342046
dc.identifier.startpage1169
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1887
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/22609
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.identifier.wos001279400900008
dc.keywordsProstate cancer
dc.keywordsRadical prostatectomy
dc.keywordsPostoperative management
dc.keywordsPSA
dc.keywordsSalvage radiation therapy
dc.keywordsAdjuvant therapy
dc.keywordsGleason score
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmerican Medical Association (AMA)
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofJAMA Oncology
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.subjectOncology
dc.subjectUrology
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titlePostoperative management of prostate cancer—optimizing prostate cancer care
dc.typeOther
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorTilki, Derya
relation.isGoalOfPublicationa9786601-9431-4553-9a46-013bb366fb87
relation.isGoalOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya9786601-9431-4553-9a46-013bb366fb87
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files