Thrombotic microangiopathy in the renal allograft: results of the TMA Banff working group consensus on pathologic diagnostic criteria

Thumbnail Image

Publication Date

Advisor

Institution Author

Baydar, Dilek Ertoy

Co-Authors

Afrouzian, Marjan
Kozakowski, Nicolas
Liapis, Helen
Broecker, Verena
Truong, Luon
Avila-Casado, Carmen
Regele, Heinz
Seshan, Surya
Ambruzs, Josephine M.
Farris, Alton Brad

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher:

Frontiers Media Sa
View PlumX Details

Abstract

The Banff community summoned the TMA Banff Working Group to develop minimum diagnostic criteria (MDC) and recommendations for renal transplant TMA (Tx-TMA) diagnosis, which currently lacks standardized criteria. Using the Delphi method for consensus generation, 23 nephropathologists (panelists) with >3 years of diagnostic experience with Tx-TMA were asked to list light, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopic, clinical and laboratory criteria and differential diagnoses for Tx-TMA. Delphi was modified to include 2 validations rounds with histological evaluation of whole slide images of 37 transplant biopsies (28 TMA and 9 non-TMA). Starting with 338 criteria in R1, MDC were narrowed down to 24 in R8 generating 18 pathological, 2 clinical, 4 laboratory criteria, and 8 differential diagnoses. The panelists reached a good level of agreement (70%) on 76% of the validated cases. For the first time in Banff classification, Delphi was used to reach consensus on MDC for Tx-TMA. Phase I of the study (pathology phase) will be used as a model for Phase II (nephrology phase) for consensus regarding clinical and laboratory criteria. Eventually in Phase III (consensus of the consensus groups) and the final MDC for Tx-TMA will be reported to the transplantation community.

Description

Subject

Surgery, Transplantation

Citation

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Copyrights Note