Publication:
Comparing performance between clinics of an embryo evaluation algorithm based on time-lapse images and machine learning

Thumbnail Image

Organizational Units

Program

KU-Authors

Keleş, İpek

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Johansen, Martin N.
Parner, Erik T.
Kragh, Mikkel F.
Kato, Keiichi
Ueno, Satoshi
Palm, Stefan
Kernbach, Manuel
Balaban, Basak
Gabrielsen, Anette V.
Iversen, Lea H.

Advisor

Publication Date

Language

en

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Abstract

PurposeThis article aims to assess how differences in maternal age distributions between IVF clinics affect the performance of an artificial intelligence model for embryo viability prediction and proposes a method to account for such differences.MethodsUsing retrospectively collected data from 4805 fresh and frozen single blastocyst transfers of embryos incubated for 5 to 6 days, the discriminative performance was assessed based on fetal heartbeat outcomes. The data was collected from 4 clinics, and the discrimination was measured in terms of the area under ROC curves (AUC) for each clinic. To account for the different age distributions between clinics, a method for age-standardizing the AUCs was developed in which the clinic-specific AUCs were standardized using weights for each embryo according to the relative frequency of the maternal age in the relevant clinic compared to the age distribution in a common reference population.ResultsThere was substantial variation in the clinic-specific AUCs with estimates ranging from 0.58 to 0.69 before standardization. The age-standardization of the AUCs reduced the between-clinic variance by 16%. Most notably, three of the clinics had quite similar AUCs after standardization, while the last clinic had a markedly lower AUC both with and without standardization.ConclusionThe method of using age-standardization of the AUCs that is proposed in this article mitigates some of the variability between clinics. This enables a comparison of clinic-specific AUCs where the difference in age distributions is accounted for.

Source:

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Publisher:

Springer/Plenum Publishers

Keywords:

Subject

Genetics, Gynecology, Reproductive Biology

Citation

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Copyrights Note

3

Views

3

Downloads

View PlumX Details