2024-12-2920231010-660X10.3390/medicina590611532-s2.0-85163778372https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061153https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/23483Aim and Objectives: We aimed to test the impact of age on long-term urinary continence (& GE;12 months) in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Methods and Materials: We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify the patients who underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy between January 2014 and January 2021. Patients were divided into three age groups: age group one (& LE;60 years), age group two (61-69 years) and age group three (& GE;70 years). Multivariable logistic regression models tested the differences between the age groups in the analyses addressing long-term urinary continence after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Results: Of the 201 prostate cancer patients treated with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, 49 (24%) were assigned to age group one (& LE;60 years), 93 (46%) to age group two (61-69 years) and 59 (29%) to age group three (& GE;70 years). The three age groups differed according to long-term urinary continence: 90% vs. 84% vs. 69% for, respectively, age group one vs. two vs. three (p = 0.018). In the multivariable logistic regression, age group one (Odds Ratio (OR) 4.73, 95% CI 1.44-18.65, p = 0.015) and 2 (OR 2.94; 95% CI 1.23-7.29; p = 0.017) were independent predictors for urinary continence, compared to age group three. Conclusion: Younger age, especially & LE;60 years, was associated with better urinary continence after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. This observation is important at the point of patient education and should be discussed in informed consent.MedicineGeneralInternalJournal article1648-91441017188600001Q141626