2024-11-1020221018-868110.14744/DaJPNS.2022.001862-s2.0-85141136456http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/DaJPNS.2022.00186https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/15947The anonymous tale (my version) of five medical doctors hunting is not far from telling the truth: The physicians saw a bird taking off from the bush and wanted to be sure that it was a duck and not a goose before they shot it. The general practitioner deferred the decision to the specialists. The internist did not want to comment without having a lab test. The surgeon proposed hitting the animal before it was too late. The pathologist warned that an insufficient specimen would not allow a definitive opinion even after a completed action. The psychiatrist was the last resort. After a short silence, she asked: Is what you see what you get?PsychiatryOther1309-5749862318000001N/A7200