Department of International Relations2024-11-0920121353-019410.1080/13530194.2012.7096992-s2.0-84865964159https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/2338This article comparatively assesses the meaning of civil society in Egypt, Lebanon and Turkey, by utilising the results of a study conducted among civil society actors. In recent decades, civil society has become integral to discussions of political liberalisation. At the same time, there is a growing rift between international democracy promotion through investment in civil society and the more critical literature on the relationship between the two. This article makes three contributions to these debates by comparing the actual experiences of civil society actors. First, it argues that the boundaries between states and civil societies are indeterminate, making it problematic to expect civil society organisations alone to become catalysts for regime transformation. Second, it shows that expectations of monolithic generation of civic values through civil society organisations do not reflect the actual experience of actors in this realm. Finally, it argues for taking into consideration other sources of mobilisation as potential contributors to meaningful political and social transformation.pdfPolitical scienceGovernment and lawDemocracyJournal Article1469-3542https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2012.709699308239300001Q3NOIR00208