Department of Philosophy2024-11-0920171757-063810.1080/17570638.2017.13319172-s2.0-85019757156http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17570638.2017.1331917https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/11486This article is a response to Robert Bernasconi's critical philosophy of race. I start by speaking of the specific style in which life and philosophy are related in his work. I argue that he devises a political phenomenology which considers the lived experiences of racialization and inquires into their historical conditions, which have become "practico-inert" in facticity. Bernasconi's thesis that the history of race is not determined by racial essentialism and his account of race as a border concept call for an expansion of the notion of race that will better serve the cause of the global fight against racism.PhilosophyCritical philosophy of race as political phenomenology: questions for Robert BernasconiJournal Article1757-0646404672900003N/A2178