2024-11-1020231479-666X10.1016/j.surge.2022.03.0032-s2.0-85126888091http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2022.03.003https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/16228Background: A single-institution retrospective analysis was undertaken to assess long-term results of definitive surgical reconstruction for major bile duct injuries and risk factors for restenosis. Methods: Patients treated between January 1995 and October 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. The primary outcome measure was patency. Results: Of 417 patients referred to a tertiary center, 290 (69.5%) underwent surgical reconstruction; mostly in the form of a hepaticojejunostomy (n = 281, 96.8%). Major liver resection was undertaken in 18 patients (6.2%). There were 7 postoperative deaths (2.4%). Patency was achieved in 97.4% of primary repairs and 88.8% of re-repairs. Primary patency at three months (including postoperative deaths and stents removed afterwards) in primary repairs was significantly higher than secondary patency attained during the same period in re-repairs (89.3% vs 76.5%, p < 0.01). The actuarial primary patency was also significantly higher compared to the actuarial secondary patency 10 years after reconstruction (86.7% vs 70.4%, p = 0.001). Vascular disruption was the only independent predictor of loss of patency after reconstruction (OR 7.09, 95% CI 3.45–14.49, p < 0.001), showing interaction with injuries at or above the biliary bifurcation (OR 9.52, 95% CI 2.56–33.33, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Long-term outcome of surgical reconstruction for major bile duct injuries was superior in primary repairs compared to re-repairs. Concomitant vascular injury was independently associated with loss of patency requiring revision. © 2022 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in IrelandLaparoscopic cholecystectomyBile ductsCholangiographySurgical reconstruction of major bile duct injuries: long-term results and risk factors for restenosisJournal Articlehttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85126888091&doi=10.1016%2fj.surge.2022.03.003&partnerID=40&md5=14a5abb18888c5328c2c5c56ec9ec3761062067600001844