Publication:
Diagnosis and staging of patients with prostate cancer: report from the 2025 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) diagnostics

dc.contributor.coauthorFanti, S.
dc.contributor.coauthorTurco, F.
dc.contributor.coauthorTombal, B.
dc.contributor.coauthorWalz, J.
dc.contributor.coauthorHofman, M. S.
dc.contributor.coauthorHadaschik, B.
dc.contributor.coauthorEmmett, L.
dc.contributor.coauthorPecoraro, G.
dc.contributor.coauthorSalfi, G.
dc.contributor.coauthorAttard, G.
dc.contributor.coauthorBeltran, H.
dc.contributor.coauthorBjartell, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorBriganti, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorBurger, I. A.
dc.contributor.coauthorCastro, E.
dc.contributor.coauthorCerci, J. J.
dc.contributor.coauthorChiti, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorCooperberg, M.
dc.contributor.coauthorFizazi, K.
dc.contributor.coauthorFossati, N.
dc.contributor.coauthorGafita, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorGallina, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorGoffin, K.
dc.contributor.coauthorHorvath, L. G.
dc.contributor.coauthorHugosson, J.
dc.contributor.coauthorIagaru, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorJames, N. D.
dc.contributor.coauthorKasivisvanathan, V.
dc.contributor.coauthorKoh, D. M.
dc.contributor.coauthorKristiansen, G.
dc.contributor.coauthorKumar, R.
dc.contributor.coauthorLecouvet, F.
dc.contributor.coauthorLoeb, S.
dc.contributor.coauthorMcKay, R. R.
dc.contributor.coauthorMorris, M. J.
dc.contributor.coauthorMurphy, D. G.
dc.contributor.coauthorMurthy, V.
dc.contributor.coauthorNaoun, N.
dc.contributor.coauthorOprea-Lager, D. E.
dc.contributor.coauthorOst, P.
dc.contributor.coauthorO'Sullivan, J.
dc.contributor.coauthorPadhani, A. R.
dc.contributor.coauthorPalapattu, G.
dc.contributor.coauthorPaone, G.
dc.contributor.coauthorPetralia, G.
dc.contributor.coauthorRoobol, M. J.
dc.contributor.coauthorSartor, O. A.
dc.contributor.coauthorSathekge, M.
dc.contributor.coauthorSchuster, D. M.
dc.contributor.coauthorSeibert, T. M.
dc.contributor.coauthorSpratt, D. E.
dc.contributor.coauthorTempany, C.
dc.contributor.coauthorTunariu, N.
dc.contributor.coauthorVargas, H. A.
dc.contributor.coauthorVogl, U. M.
dc.contributor.coauthorWyatt, A. W.
dc.contributor.coauthorZilli, T.
dc.contributor.coauthorLin, H. M.
dc.contributor.coauthorOmlin, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorGillessen, S.
dc.contributor.coauthorHerrmann, K.
dc.contributor.departmentKUH (Koç University Hospital)
dc.contributor.kuauthorTilki, Derya
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteKUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-22T13:08:13Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractFor over a decade the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) covers a variety of topics that greatly impact daily practice. In 2025, a dedicated event was organised to discuss key questions in clinical management of patients with prostate cancer (PC) related to diagnostic tools (APCCC Diagnostics). Here we present the voting results of the APCCC Diagnostics questions. Objective; Design, setting, and partecipants APCCC Diagnostics 2025 is a pilot project. The scientific committee for APCCC Diagnostics 2025 developed 88 multiple-choice consensus questions on six different topics. Prior to the conference, the panel members (‘‘panellists’’) voted on these questions via a web-based survey. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. Outcomes measurements and statistical analysis Consensus was only reached on 17 of 88 questions (19%), of which six (7%) received a strong consensus. Specifically, consensus was reached for two of 17 questions (14%) in “how to diagnose PC”; seven of 16 (44%) in “how to stage PC”; three of 14 (21%) in “Biochemical Recurrence Scenario”; two of 11 (18%) in “metastatic disease: what to do?”; zero of 18 (0%) in “monitoring metastatic PC”; and three of 12 (25%) in “radioligand therapy and imaging.” Conclusions The voting results and their discussion may assist physicians in navigating controversial areas of clinical management related to diagnosis, staging, and restaging in the different clinical settings for PC, particularly where high-level evidence is scarce or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers in prioritising areas for future research.
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.versionPublished Version
dc.identifier.ScopusPercentile99
dc.identifier.ScopusQuartileQ1
dc.identifier.WoSPercentile98.9
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ1
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eururo.2026.06.009
dc.identifier.eissn1421-993X
dc.identifier.embargoN/A
dc.identifier.issn0302-2838
dc.identifier.pubmed42399196
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105043824885
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2026.06.009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/33755
dc.keywordsBiochemical recurrence
dc.keywordsMetastatic prostate cancer
dc.keywordsProstate cancer
dc.keywordsRadioligand therapy
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Urology
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectOncology
dc.subjectUrology
dc.titleDiagnosis and staging of patients with prostate cancer: report from the 2025 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) diagnostics
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee

Files