Publication:
Beyond anti-Müllerian hormone or antral follicle count alone: anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count ratio as marker of ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophins

Placeholder

Departments

Organizational Unit

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU-Authors

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Melado, L.
Lawrenz, B.
Gallego, R. D.
Ruiz, F.
Marqueta, L.
Khatib, I. E.
Fatemi, H.

Editor & Affiliation

Compiler & Affiliation

Translator

Other Contributor

Date

Language

eng

Embargo Status

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Research question Is the anti-Müllerian hormone to antral follicle count ratio (AMH‒AFC) associated with ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophins during ovarian stimulation? Design Retrospective cohort study including 2162 IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection ovarian stimulation cycles carried out using a gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist protocol at a tertiary IVF centre. Associations between the AMH‒AFC ratio and ovarian responsiveness were evaluated with multiple regression analysis using the follicular output rate (FOR), follicle-to-oocyte index (FOI) and oocytes retrieved. Results The AMH‒AFC ratio showed significant positive correlation with both FOI (r = 0.62, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.65) and FOR (r = 0.62, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.65; both P < 0.001), with stronger associations than AMH or AFC when assessed individually. When stratified by AMH‒AFC quartiles, a progressive increase was observed in pre-ovulatory follicles, retrieved oocytes, metaphase II oocytes, FOI and FOR across higher ratio categories. In multivariable analyses adjusted for age, body mass index and gonadotrophin dose, the AMH‒AFC ratio explained a greater proportion of variance in FOI and FOR than either marker alone. The combined use of AMH and AFC, however, remained superior for predicting absolute oocyte and metaphase II yield. Conclusions The AMH‒AFC ratio is associated with dynamic markers of ovarian responsiveness during ovarian stimulation and may provide complementary information regarding follicular sensitivity to gonadotrophins. Although it does not replace the combined use of AMH and AFC for predicting absolute oocyte yield, the ratio may help identify women with discordant ovarian reserve profiles who are at risk of suboptimal ovarian response despite apparently reassuring follicle counts.

Source

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

AMH, AFC, FOR, FOI, Ovarian stimulation

Citation

Has Part

Source

Reproductive Biomedicine Online

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105893

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Goal

1

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details