Publication:
ProBIOPSY: a multidisciplinary international consensus on standards for prostate biopsy

Placeholder

Departments

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit

Program

KU-Authors

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Chernysheva, D.
Di Bello, F.
Avesani, G.
Baboudjian, M.
Barret, E.
Breda, A.
Briganti, A.
Budäus, L.
Comperat, E.
Diamand, R.

Editor & Affiliation

Compiler & Affiliation

Translator

Other Contributor

Date

Language

eng

Embargo Status

N/A

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Prostate biopsy is a complex, multi-step procedure lacking standardisation across patient selection, tools, technique, and biopsy strategy, potentially influencing local treatment planning. An international consensus project was initiated to harmonise these aspects. Methods and analysis A systematic review informed statement development. A modified Delphi process involving 34 international experts was conducted over three rounds. Panellists evaluated 96, 99, and 112 statements in Rounds 1–3, respectively, grouped into 36 stems. Statements were iteratively revised based on feedback and discussion. Consensus was assessed using a modified RAND appropriateness method. Key findings and limitations All experts completed the three rounds. Consensus was achieved for 29 of 36 stems (81%). Both biparametric and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging were endorsed within the diagnostic pathway, provided imaging quality is adequate. Key elements of a targeted plus perilesional biopsy scheme were harmonised. For treatment planning, a targeted ± perilesional biopsy scheme was considered sufficient for most aspects of local treatment planning. However, additional contralateral sampling still seems necessary for specific indications, notably focal therapy candidate selection. Limitations include imbalances in specialty representation and heterogeneity in expertise across topics. Conclusion and clinical implications The ProBIOPSY consensus defines a contemporary, standardised framework for prostate biopsy. While targeted-based strategies are sufficient for most clinical scenarios, no single biopsy approach provides complete information for all treatment decisions, underscoring the need for indication-specific biopsy tailoring.

Source

Publisher

Elsevier

Subject

Prostate cancer, Medicine

Citation

Has Part

Source

European Urology

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1016/j.eururo.2026.06.012

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Goal

0

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details