Publication:
Conversation: buildings: cross-cultural perspectives on architectural history, healthcare architecture, and environmental humanities

dc.contributor.coauthorTunç, U.
dc.contributor.coauthorBalsa de Pinho, J.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Archaeology and History of Art
dc.contributor.kuauthorŞenocak, Lucienne
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-14T11:21:23Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractThis conversation piece focuses on several issues related to health and environmental humanities and the intersections of these fields with architectural history and critical heritage studies. The conversation is centred around three themes: sustainability and the adaptive reuse of healthcare architecture, the persistence of a nature-culture divide in the theory and practice of heritage studies and architectural history, and the re-emergence of concepts, such as biophilic design, for healthcare architecture that have gained popularity since the COVID-19 pandemic. Within the context of these three themes, architectural historians Uğurgül Tunç, Lucienne Thys-Şenocak, and Joana Balsa de Pinho discuss case studies from various geographies and time periods: the European Renaissance, the Early Modern Ottoman era, the first decades of twentieth-century Türkiye, contemporary Portugal, Canada, and the US. Most of the case studies discussed here are examples of architectural typologies related to healthcare, such as hospitals and medical research centres, and reflect the research interests of the conversation participants. This conversation, while addressing methodological concerns about health and environmental humanities, explores how these fields are related to architectural history. The participants highlight how architectural historians can play an important role in guiding and inspiring design decisions for healthcare architecture by looking more critically and creatively at this building typology, and building practices of the past. The participants conclude that there are many benefits to stepping outside the narrower methodological boundaries of architectural history to entangle their research in health and environmental humanities.
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.versionPublished Version
dc.identifier.ScopusPercentileN/A
dc.identifier.ScopusQuartileN/A
dc.identifier.WoSPercentileN/A
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileN/A
dc.identifier.doi10.4324/9781003404866-53
dc.identifier.embargoN/A
dc.identifier.endpage556
dc.identifier.isbn9781003404866
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105034229242
dc.identifier.startpage542
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.4324/9781003404866-53
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/34362
dc.keywordsConversation
dc.keywordsContext (archaeology)
dc.keywordsArchitecture
dc.keywordsHistory of architecture
dc.keywordsPopularity
dc.keywordsSustainability
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofThe Routledge Handbook of Health and Environmental Humanities
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.rights.uriN/A
dc.subjectArt history
dc.titleConversation: buildings: cross-cultural perspectives on architectural history, healthcare architecture, and environmental humanities
dc.typeBook Chapter
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication4833084d-e402-4d8d-bee7-053d7b7ca9d7
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4833084d-e402-4d8d-bee7-053d7b7ca9d7
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication3f7621e3-0d26-42c2-af64-58a329522794
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3f7621e3-0d26-42c2-af64-58a329522794

Files