<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Publication:
But for the bad, there would not be good: grounding valence in brightness through shared relational structures

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Departments

Item type:Organizational Unit,

School / College / Institute

Program

Organization Authors

Co-Authors

Lakens, Daniel

Foroni Francesco

Date

Language

Embargo Status

NO

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Light and dark are used pervasively to represent positive and negative concepts. Recent studies suggest that black and white stimuli are automatically associated with negativity and positivity. However, structural factors in experimental designs, such as the shared opposition in the valence (good vs. bad) and brightness (light vs. dark) dimensions might play an important role in the valence– brightness association. In 6 experiments, we show that while black ideographs are consistently judged to represent negative words, white ideographs represent positivity only when the negativity of black is coactivated. The positivity of white emerged only when brightness and valence were manipulated within participants (but not between participants) or when the negativity of black was perceptually activated by presenting positive and white stimuli against a black (vs. gray) background. These findings add to an emerging literature on how structural overlap between dimensions creates associations and highlight the inherently contextualized construction of meaning structures.

Source

Publisher

American Psychological Association (APA)

Citation

item.page.haspartof

Source

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

item.page.ispartofseries

item.page.edition

DOI

10.1037/a0026468

item.page.datauri

item.page.link

Rights

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Patent

Related Goal

Google Scholar
Scholar'da Ara ↗
Altmetric
Dimensions
PlumX Metrikleri
BIP! Indicators