Publication: Ics educational module: urethral pressure profilometry
Program
KU-Authors
KU Authors
Co-Authors
Solomon, E.
Greenwell, T.
Panicker, J. N.
Serati, M.
Stephens, R.
Tarcan, T.
Editor & Affiliation
Compiler & Affiliation
Translator
Other Contributor
Date
Language
eng
Type
Embargo Status
N/A
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Alternative Title
Abstract
To present an ICS teaching module on urethral pressure profilometry. This teaching module provides a summary of the evidence base on UPP principles, measurements, and potential clinical applications. Methods This module has been prepared by a Working Group commissioned by the ICS Urodynamics Committee. A comprehensive literature review was performed using modified PRISMA methodology, followed by a review by the members of the Working Group and the ICS Urodynamics Committee core panel. Results The literature review identified 249 publications, of which 81 were accessible, published in English, and involved human subjects. These publications form the evidence base for the preparation of this manuscript. Various UPP technologies have been proposed, each offering distinct advantages and limitations. There is a lack of standardization regarding how UPP is performed and interpreted. Despite these challenges, UPP has demonstrated clinical utility in patients with stress urinary incontinence and dysfunctional voiding. Additionally, UPP has potential research and clinical applications in patients with symptoms that may be secondary to or demonstrate associated “urethral instability” (transient variations to the neural drive to the external sphincter which may result in detrusor overactivity, giggle incontinence, and urethral relaxation incontinence). UPP may also have intra- and peri-operative applications for optimizing urethral closure pressure during or after SUI surgery (e.g. adjustable mid-urethral slings). Conclusions UPP has demonstrable clinical and research utility in pathologies where urethral closure pressure may be transiently or consistently reduced or increased. Technological advances, standardization of data collection and interpretation would increase clinical uptake of UPP as well as potential consideration as an outcome measure for treatments.
Source
Publisher
Elsevier
Subject
Urology, Nephrology
Citation
Has Part
Source
Continence
Book Series Title
Edition
DOI
10.1016/j.cont.2026.102464
item.page.datauri
Link
Rights
N/A
Copyrights Note
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as N/A
