Publication:
Micro and transport layer security benchmarking of post-quantum versus classical cryptography

dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
dc.contributor.kuauthorOnbaşlı, Mehmet Cengiz
dc.contributor.kuauthorGörgülü, İdil
dc.contributor.kuauthorDemir, Dicle Elif
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-14T11:25:04Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractAs quantum computing advances, widely deployed public-key cryptosystems face a credible long-term risk, motivating a transition to post-quantum cryptography (PQC). Building on NIST’s standardization, this paper evaluates the practical performance of CRYSTALS-Kyber and CRYSTALS-Dilithium through both microbenchmarks and TLS 1.3 deployments, with the expectation that compute costs remain competitive while deployment overhead is dominated by larger handshake messages. At the algorithm level, we measure key generation, encapsulation/decapsulation, signing, and verification for reference and AVX2-optimized implementations using a consistent toolchain and runtime configuration, and compare them against classical baselines (RSA, ECDH, and ECDSA). Across tested parameter sets, AVX2 delivers multifold speedups and keeps operations in the sub-millisecond range, with Kyber and Dilithium execution times that are competitive with or better than security-aligned classical counterparts. At the protocol level, we integrate ML-KEM and ML-DSA into TLS 1.3 and extract handshake latency (ClientHello→ServerHello and ClientHello→END) and handshake message sizes from captured traces in a low-RTT setting. PQC handshakes incur only a modest latency increase at the 128-bit level relative to P-256, while at 192- and 256-bit security they complete substantially faster than P-384 and P-521 configurations. The main cost is bandwidth: server-to-client handshake traffic increases from a few kilobytes in classical TLS to roughly 8–15 kB under PQC. Overall, the results indicate that deployment challenges are driven less by computation than by larger handshake footprints, especially on bandwidth- or RTT-constrained links.
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuEU
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Research Council Proof of Concept project AURORA (Grant: ERC-2025-POC); European Research Council Proof of Concept project AURORA (Grant: 101293210)
dc.description.versionPublished Version
dc.identifier.ScopusPercentile91
dc.identifier.ScopusQuartileQ1
dc.identifier.WoSPercentile66,5
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ2
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/access.2026.3682760
dc.identifier.embargoN/A
dc.identifier.endpage56111
dc.identifier.grantnoERC-2025-POC
dc.identifier.grantno101293210
dc.identifier.issn2169-3536
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105036334754
dc.identifier.startpage56099
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1109/access.2026.3682760
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/34517
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.wos001747679400017
dc.keywordsTelemetry
dc.keywordsAerospace and electronic systems
dc.keywordsMotion pictures
dc.keywordsCentral processing unit
dc.keywordsAI accelerators
dc.keywordsElectronic circuits
dc.keywordsMicroprocessor chips
dc.keywordsCommunication systems
dc.keywordsProtocols
dc.keywordsInternet of things
dc.keywordsPost-quantum cryptography
dc.keywordsCRYSTALS-kyber
dc.keywordsCRYSTALS-dilithium
dc.keywordsNIST standardization
dc.keywordsPQC benchmarking
dc.keywordsTelecommunications security
dc.keywordsCryptographic deployment
dc.keywordsQuantum-safe networks
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherIEEE
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Access
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.rights.uriN/A
dc.subjectTelecommunications
dc.subjectComputer science
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectComputer vision and pattern recognition
dc.titleMicro and transport layer security benchmarking of post-quantum versus classical cryptography
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication21598063-a7c5-420d-91ba-0cc9b2db0ea0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery21598063-a7c5-420d-91ba-0cc9b2db0ea0
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication8e756b23-2d4a-4ce8-b1b3-62c794a8c164
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8e756b23-2d4a-4ce8-b1b3-62c794a8c164

Files