Publication:
Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation have an additive effect on disability, pain and abdominal and lumbar muscle thickness in chronic low back pain? - a randomized controlled double-blind study

Placeholder

Departments

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Coşkunsu, Dilber Karagözoğlu

Editor & Affiliation

Compiler & Affiliation

Translator

Other Contributor

Date

Language

Embargo Status

N/A

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Hat die neuromuskuläre elektrostimulation eine additive wirkung auf die bewegungseinschränkung, die schmerzintensität, die lebensqualität und die muskelkraft im bauch-und lendenbereich bei chronischen rückenschmerzen?-eine randomisierte, kontrollierte doppelblindstudie

Abstract

Objective To examine the effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with core stabilization exercises (CSE) in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods Thirty-six patients (mean age 33.6±12.6 years) with CLBP were randomly assigned to 4 weeks (12 sessions) of NMES group (NMES combined with CSE) (n=18) vs. Control group (sham NMES and CSE) (n=18). After the 4 weeks, same exercises were given as home exercise program without NMES. The outcome measures were Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and ultrasonography. Ultrasonography was used for measuring transversus abdominis (TrA), internal oblique (IO), external oblique (EO) muscles thickness and lumbar multifidus muscle thickness and area. Assessments were performed at baseline and 4th week and eighth week follow-up. Results In both groups, the change of ODI, VAS and NHP values of the first measurement according to the values of the 4th week and the eighth week were found statistically significant (p=0.001; p<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in ODI, VAS and NHP scores between the 4th week and the eighth week in both groups (p>0.05). None of NMES and control group measurements with US showed a statistically significant increase in the TrA, IO, EO thickness and multifidus thickness and area (p>0.05). Conclusions It was shown that NMES can be tolerated by patients with CLBP, but the addition of simultaneus NMES to CSE had no contribution to the clinical outcome measures. © 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Source

Publisher

Subject

Rehabilitation, Back muscle ultrasonography, Muscle thickness measurement, Chronic low back pain treatment

Citation

Has Part

Source

Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1055/a-1577-9849

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

N/A

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Goal

Thumbnail Image
Sustainable Development GoalsOpen Access
03 - Good Health and Well-being
Over the last 15 years, the number of childhood deaths has been cut in half. This proves that it is possible to win the fight against almost every disease. Still, we are spending an astonishing amount of money and resources on treating illnesses that are surprisingly easy to prevent. The new goal for worldwide Good Health promotes healthy lifestyles, preventive measures and modern, efficient healthcare for everyone.

3

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details