Publication:
Perspective-taking and partisan depolarization in the US and Türkiye

dc.contributor.coauthorHuddy, L.
dc.contributor.departmentGraduate School of Business
dc.contributor.kuauthorPaksoy, Cansu
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-19T19:50:12Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractThere is keen research interest in the reduction of affective polarization, which can worsen interpersonal interactions and challenge democratic norms. Past research has generated inconsistent findings on efforts to reduce affective polarization, however, including their ability to backfire. Additionally, studies have primarily focused on the two-party U.S. political system, resulting in less information about the success of interventions in a multiparty system. In this study, we test the ability of perspective-taking (PT) to reduce affective polarization in two highly polarized contexts: Turkey, a typical multi-party context, and the U.S. two-party system. We use a specific form of PT, perspective-getting (PG), which is less likely to backfire and has proven to be more successful than other forms of PT in mitigating polarization. Data is drawn from a Facebook sample in Turkey (N = 605), and an MTurk sample in the U.S. (N = 386; 186 Republicans, 200 Democrats). The PG intervention improved attitudes towards an out-partisan target person in both national contexts and boosted feelings of warmth towards outpartisans more generally in both countries when compared to a control condition. The PG intervention was less successful in reducing negative cognitions about out-partisans. This study documents the success of a PG exercise and lends insight into the reduction of affective polarization in two national contexts.
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad de Deusto
dc.description.versionPublished Version
dc.identifier.ScopusPercentile96
dc.identifier.ScopusQuartileQ1
dc.identifier.WoSPercentile86.6
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ1
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11109-026-10175-2
dc.identifier.eissn1573-6687
dc.identifier.embargoN/A
dc.identifier.endpage29
dc.identifier.issn0190-9320
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105042521442
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-026-10175-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/33634
dc.identifier.wos001798882000001
dc.keywordsAffective polarization
dc.keywordsConflict reduction
dc.keywordsPerspective-taking
dc.keywordsPerspective-getting
dc.keywordsTurkey
dc.keywordsUnited states
dc.keywordsFeeling
dc.keywordsPolarization (electrochemistry)
dc.keywordsPolitics
dc.keywordsInterpersonal communication
dc.keywordsPsychological intervention
dc.keywordsDemocracy
dc.keywordsIntervention (counseling)
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofPolitical Behavior
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.rights.uriN/A
dc.subjectGovernment
dc.subjectLaw
dc.titlePerspective-taking and partisan depolarization in the US and Türkiye
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication66c315a1-2b3d-40d3-89e4-aab9ae3b313b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery66c315a1-2b3d-40d3-89e4-aab9ae3b313b
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublicationeae8aa5b-4ed7-47c1-a210-5860cba53ef4
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryeae8aa5b-4ed7-47c1-a210-5860cba53ef4

Files