Outcomes of a newly established transitional urology outpatient clinic: a real-world experience

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who visited our transitional urology (TU) outpatient clinic formed by pediatric urologists with urology background within the first year upon its establishment.MethodsFiles of 130 consecutive patients who visited our TU outpatient clinic, which was established in 01 March 2021, between 01 March 2021 and 01 March 2022 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into two groups: those with a previous follow-up in our pediatric urology department (Group I, n: 81, 62.3%) and those who were followed up in other clinics during childhood (Group II, n: 49, 37.7%) afterwards. Demographic characteristics, complaints at admission, previous medical history, and management plans at the recent clinical visit were noted. We defined a successful and smooth transition from childhood to adult care as not being without follow-up within the first year after the age of 18 years and not requiring extraordinary medical assistance (e.g., emergency room visits, hospitalization, intensive care unit admissions) from the last urological control to the TU outpatient clinic visits.ResultsThe most common diagnoses were vesicoureteral reflux (n: 32, 24.6%), neuropathic bladder accompanied by spina bifida (n: 31, 23.8%), obstructive uropathy (n: 25, 19.2%), hypospadias (n: 20, 15.3%), non-neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (n: 19, 14.6%), and bladder exstrophy (n: 8, 6.1%). The distribution of primary diagnosis in the two patient groups was similar. The median time from the last pediatric urology visit to the current TU clinical visit was significantly longer in Group II (12 vs. 60 months, p < 0.001),consequently, the median patient age at admission was significantly higher in Group II (21 vs. 23 years, p = 0.020). The rate of a successful and smooth transition was 86.4% in Group I, whereas Group II had a completely unsuccessful transition period. Upon admission to TU outpatient clinic, the requirement of a surgical intervention was lower in Group I (21% vs. 38.8%, p = 0.028).Also,the need for medical treatment changes was higher in Group II (9.9% vs. 53.1%, p < 0.001).ConclusionOur findings emphasize the importance of patient referral to a TU clinic that deal with lifelong problems of congenital genitourinary diseases. Delays in receiving medical or surgical treatments during transition from childhood to adulthood may be associated with higher need for subsequent surgical interventions in this vulnerable patient population.