Publication:
Readiness for prehospital Point-of-care ultrasound among EMS personnel in a system where ultrasound is not yet implemented: a National cross-sectional survey

dc.contributor.coauthorGünsoy, E.
dc.contributor.coauthorGülünay, B.
dc.contributor.coauthorAykut, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorYıldırım, C.
dc.contributor.coauthorKuas, Ç.
dc.contributor.departmentKUH (Koç University Hospital)
dc.contributor.kuauthorSelman, Fatma
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteKUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T08:50:16Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly used in emergency and critical care for rapid, radiation-free bedside imaging. However, its integration into prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) remains inconsistent, particularly in paramedic-based systems where physician support is limited. This study evaluated the knowledge, attitudes, and readiness of EMS personnel toward adopting POCUS in a national prehospital system where ultrasound has not yet been implemented. METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional survey was conducted between March and August 2023 among prehospital EMS professionals working in Türkiye’s national emergency medical services system, where prehospital ultrasound is not routinely implemented. A 27-item online questionnaire assessed demographics, previous ultrasound training and use, perceived diagnostic applications, and barriers to field implementation. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and compared using chi-square tests, while qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 156 EMS professionals participated, most being paramedics (73.1%) working in urban settings (58.3%). Only 21.2% had prior ultrasound training and 22.4% hands-on experience. Nevertheless, 95.5% expressed willingness to receive training, and 90.4% reported interest in using POCUS during prehospital care. The most prioritized applications were intra-abdominal hemorrhage (96.2%), pneumothorax (82.7%), aortic aneurysm (85.3%), and cardiac tamponade (80.1%). Key barriers included lack of equipment, limited training opportunities, and lack of clear regulatory guidelines and defined scope of practice for EMS personnel regarding ultrasound use. CONCLUSION: EMS personnel in a paramedic-based prehospital system demonstrated high readiness but limited exposure to POCUS. Structured training programs, pilot implementation projects, and clear regulatory frameworks may support the safe and effective integration of ultrasound into prehospital emergency care.
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.versionPublished Version
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ2
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12873-026-01594-9
dc.identifier.embargoN/A
dc.identifier.endpage7
dc.identifier.issn1471-227X
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pubmed42046005
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105041411895
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01594-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/33323
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.identifier.wos001789079000001
dc.keywordsPrehospital care
dc.keywordsPoint-of-care ultrasound
dc.keywordsEmergency medical services
dc.keywordsReadiness
dc.keywordsTraining
dc.keywordsImplementation
dc.keywordsScope of practice
dc.keywordsEmergency ultrasound
dc.keywordsThematic analysis
dc.keywordsAdvanced life support
dc.keywordsTamponade
dc.keywordsPrehospital emergency care
dc.keywordsUltrasound
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Emergency Medicine
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.rights.uriN/A
dc.subjectEmergency medicine
dc.titleReadiness for prehospital Point-of-care ultrasound among EMS personnel in a system where ultrasound is not yet implemented: a National cross-sectional survey
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee

Files