Corrigendum to “systematic review and pooled analysis of functional and sexual outcomes of minimally invasive surgical treatments for benign prostatic obstruction”(European urology, (2026), 89, 4, (318-331), (s0302283825004920), 10.1016/J.Eururo.2025.09.004)

Abstract

Authors and title are correct. The authors regret an error in the reported anejaculation rate for the temporary implantable nitinol device (iTind) in the above article. The anejaculation rate after iTind treatment was incorrectly stated as 1% in three sections of the article. The correct value is 0%. The specific corrections are as follows:1.Abstract / Key findings (page 319): The sentence “Anejaculation rates were 5% with TPLA, 3% with Rezum, 1% with iTIND, and 0% with UroLift and Optilume” should read: “Anejaculation rates were 5% with TPLA, 3% with Rezum, and 0% with iTIND, UroLift and Optilume.”2.Under Table 2 (Page 322). For Amparore [38] reference, under anejaculation (last column), instead of “1 (1%, 0–7%)” should read “0”.3.Results, Section 3.3 iTind (page 324): The sentence “The anejaculation rate after iTind treatment was 1% (95% CI 0–0.07; I2 = NA)” should read: “No patients reported postoperative anejaculation.”4.Discussion, Section 3.8 / Definition of MIST success (page 325): The sentence “UroLift appears to be the safest technique, with an anejaculation rate of 0%. ” should be read “UroLift and iTIND appear to be the safest techniques, with anejaculation rates of 0%. Abstract / Key findings (page 319): The sentence “Anejaculation rates were 5% with TPLA, 3% with Rezum, 1% with iTIND, and 0% with UroLift and Optilume” should read: “Anejaculation rates were 5% with TPLA, 3% with Rezum, and 0% with iTIND, UroLift and Optilume.” Under Table 2 (Page 322). For Amparore [38] reference, under anejaculation (last column), instead of “1 (1%, 0–7%)” should read “0”. Results, Section 3.3 iTind (page 324): The sentence “The anejaculation rate after iTind treatment was 1% (95% CI 0–0.07; I2 = NA)” should read: “No patients reported postoperative anejaculation.” Discussion, Section 3.8 / Definition of MIST success (page 325): The sentence “UroLift appears to be the safest technique, with an anejaculation rate of 0%. ” should be read “UroLift and iTIND appear to be the safest techniques, with anejaculation rates of 0%. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. © 2026 European Association of Urology.