Publication:
Vaginal progesterone gel for luteal support after cleavage stage embryo transfer once or twice a day?

dc.contributor.coauthorÇelik, Serdar
dc.contributor.coauthorAlper, Ebru
dc.contributor.coauthorBalaban, Başak
dc.contributor.kuauthorUrman, Cumhur Bülent
dc.contributor.kuauthorYakın, Kayhan
dc.contributor.kuauthorAta, Mustafa Barış
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.yokid12147
dc.contributor.yokid106822
dc.contributor.yokid182910
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:51:54Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine whether twice daily dosing of progesterone vaginal gel (PVG) is better for luteal phase support (LPS) than once daily dosing. Study Design: Retrospective study including 456 women aged <= 42 years who underwent assisted reproductive technology with long GnRH agonist protocol. Blastocyst transfers and difficult embryo transfers were excluded. LPS was started with 90 mg PVG once daily on the evening of oocyte retrieval and continued until negative pregnancy test or 10th week of pregnancy in both groups. PVG dosage was doubled on the day of embryo transfer in the twice-daily group. Results: Age, duration of infertility, and number of oocytes collected were similar. Numbers of embryos transferred were 2.9 and 2.8 in the once-daily and twice-daily groups, respectively (p=0.04). Embryo implantation (23.96% vs. 27.95%) and clinical pregnancy (50.9% vs. 56.5%) rates favored twice-daily dosage; however, differences were statistically nonsignificant, and the study had 20% power to demonstrate significance. When our results were pooled with a prior trial comparing once and twice daily dosing, twice daily dosing seemed to significantly increase clinical pregnancy rate (rate ratio: 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.38). Conclusion: Trends favoring twice daily dosing are encouraging findings and require further investigation.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue44958
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.volume62
dc.identifier.doiN/A
dc.identifier.eissn1943-3565
dc.identifier.issn0024-7758
dc.identifier.quartileQ4
dc.identifier.uriN/A
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/14774
dc.identifier.wos392902900012
dc.keywordsAssisted reproductive techniques
dc.keywordsEmbryo transfer
dc.keywordsIn vitro fertilization
dc.keywordsIntracytoplasmic sperm injections
dc.keywordsLuteal phase
dc.keywordsLuteal support
dc.keywordsMicronized progesterone
dc.keywordsProgesterone
dc.keywordsReproductive technology, Assisted in-vitro fertilization
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSci Printers & Publ Inc
dc.sourceJournal of Reproductive Medicine
dc.subjectObstetrics
dc.subjectGynecology
dc.titleVaginal progesterone gel for luteal support after cleavage stage embryo transfer once or twice a day?
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0002-6076-6468
local.contributor.authorid0000-0002-8987-6062
local.contributor.authorid0000-0003-1106-3747
local.contributor.kuauthorUrman, Cumhur Bülent
local.contributor.kuauthorYakın, Kayhan
local.contributor.kuauthorAta, Mustafa Barış

Files