<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Publication:
Adjunctive probiotic use during antibiotic exposure in very preterm infants: a narrative and translational review

dc.contributor.coauthorAltındiş, M.
dc.contributor.coauthorOvalı, F.
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorAslan, Mustafa Törehan
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-15T10:56:02Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractInfants born before 32 weeks of gestation are highly susceptible to late-onset sepsis because of immune immaturity, impaired intestinal barrier function, and frequent broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure. Whether probiotics should be continued or initiated during antibiotic therapy remains unresolved and is often conflated with routine prophylaxis in stable infants. This SANRA-guided structured narrative and translational review synthesized clinical, microbiome, resistome, mechanistic, and safety evidence identified in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science through July 1, 2026, across three contexts: stable antibiotic overlap, suspected sepsis, and confirmed or unstable sepsis. Pooled prophylactic analyses suggest a small, heterogeneous reduction in late-onset infection (risk ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.95). However, the 2023 Cochrane review judged that probiotics probably have little or no effect on late-onset invasive infection (risk ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.82–0.97), the largest randomized trials were neutral, and no benefit has been demonstrated in extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight infants (risk ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.78–1.09). Direct evidence during systemic antibiotic exposure is limited to microbiome endpoints and does not establish benefit in suspected or confirmed sepsis; no randomized trial has evaluated probiotics as adjunctive treatment for active sepsis. Metagenomic studies suggest that probiotics may attenuate antibiotic-associated dysbiosis and modify the intestinal resistome, but these surrogate effects have not been shown to reduce multidrug-resistant infection. Probiotic-associated bloodstream infection was infrequently reported (8 cases among 20,323 exposed infants), although ascertainment was inconsistent and reported infections may be severe. Current evidence does not support probiotics as treatment for neonatal sepsis or routine initiation during suspected or confirmed sepsis. Prospective strain-specific trials should evaluate these three contexts separately.
dc.description.fulltextN/A
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyN/A
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.versionPublished Version
dc.identifier.ScopusPercentile26
dc.identifier.ScopusQuartileQ3
dc.identifier.WoSPercentile6.1
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ4
dc.identifier.doi10.53391/1305-7707.1080
dc.identifier.embargoN/A
dc.identifier.issn1305-7707
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.53391/1305-7707.1080
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/35475
dc.identifier.volume21
dc.keywordsNeonatal sepsis
dc.keywordsAntibiotic-associated dysbiosis
dc.keywordsIntestinal resistome
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherNecmettin Erbakan University Press
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Pediatric Infectious Diseases
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.subjectHealth sciences
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleAdjunctive probiotic use during antibiotic exposure in very preterm infants: a narrative and translational review
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files