Publications without Fulltext

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/3

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 22
  • Placeholder
    Publication
    The small, the big, and the ugly: persistent challenges of thinking about lviv's Ukrainization
    (Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2020) Department of History; Amar, Tarık Youssef Cyril; Other; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; 294014
  • Placeholder
    Publication
    Rethinking nationalism - state projects and community networks in 19th-century Ottoman Empire
    (Sage Publications Inc, 2008) N/A; Department of History; Köksal, Yonca; Faculty Member; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; 53333
    This article challenges the idea that a centralized administrative infrastructure, a common citizenship, and the resulting national belonging run in the same direction in state transformations. Comparing two Ottoman provinces of Edirne and Ankara, the author argues that community networks influence local responses to administrative centralization and national identity formation. In the province of Edirne, dense communal networks that bridged religious and ethnic boundaries maintained local cooperation with state centralization, whereas dense relations within religious and ethnic communities contributed to the failure of the formation of Ottoman national identity. In the province of Ankara, the lack of dense relations connecting different communities prevented reform success in both administrative and ideological dimensions.
  • Placeholder
    Publication
    Great catastrophe: Armenians and Turks in the shadow of genocide
    (Cambridge Univ Press, 2018) Department of History; Polatel, Mehmet; Researcher; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; N/A
  • Placeholder
    Publication
    Russian and soviet diplomacy, 1900-39
    (Oxford University Press (OUP), 2013) Department of History; McMeekin, Sean; Faculty Member; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Placeholder
    Publication
    Turkification policies of republican Turkey
    (Cambridge Univ Press, 2004) N/A; Department of History; Palaz, Cenk; Teaching Faculty; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; 236358
    N/A
  • Placeholder
    Publication
    The end of Byzantium
    (The University of Chicago Press, 2012) N/A; Department of History; Magdalino, Paul; Faculty Member; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; N/A
    N/A
  • Placeholder
    Publication
    Soviet russians under Nazi occupation: fragile loyalties in World War II
    (Oxford University Press (OUP), 2021) Department of History; Amar, Tarık Youssef Cyril; Faculty Member; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; 294014
  • Placeholder
    Publication
    The Eunuch in Byzantine history and society
    (Center Byzantine Ottoman Modern Greek Studies, 2011) N/A; Department of History; Magdalino, Paul; Faculty Member; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; N/A
    N/A
  • Placeholder
    Publication
    Before and after 1204: the versions of Niketas Choniates' Historia
    (Harvard University Press, 2006) Department of History; Simpson, Alicia J.; Other; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; N/A
    N/A
  • Placeholder
    Publication
    The transnational formation of imperial rule on the margins of Europe: 1 British Cyprus and the Italian Dodecanese in the Interwar Period
    (Sage Publications Ltd, 2015) N/A; Department of History; Rappas, Alexis; Faculty Member; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; 50773
    This article records and offers to interpret a parallel hardening of British and Italian colonial governances in the Eastern Mediterranean in the interwar period. It focuses on the cases of the Dodecanese, an Italian 'Possedimento' since 1912, and Cyprus, a British dependency since 1878, lying on the geographical and cultural margins of, and the border between, these two colonial empires. Building on the recurrent cross-references between British and Italian colonial systems in British, Italian and Greek archives, official and unofficial, this article highlights the circulation of administrative ideas and practices across imperial boundaries. It suggests that British and Italian authorities saw in enosis, or the union with Greece advocated by the Orthodox majorities under their rule, an opportunity to implement an authoritarian form of governance potentially transposable to other Mediterranean settings. Engaging with current debates on inter-imperial transfers, this article enquires into colonial policymaking as the outcome of a mutually productive exchange across territorial frontiers and assumed ideological differences.