Publications with Fulltext

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/6

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    Interobserver reliability of Glasgow Coma Scale scores for intensive care unit patients
    (American Association of Critical Care Nurses, 2020) Dikeç, Gül; Kebapçı, Ayda; Topçu, Serpil Akkuş; Faculty Member; School of Nursing; 203808; N/A
    Background: intensive care units frequently use the Glasgow Coma Scale to objectively assess patients’ levels of consciousness. Interobserver reliability of Glasgow Coma Scale scores is critical in determining the degree of impairment. Objective: to evaluate interobserver reliability of intensive care unit patients’ Glasgow Coma Scale scores. Methods: this prospective observational study evaluated Glasgow Coma Scale scoring agreement among 21 intensive care unit nurses and 2 independent researchers who assessed 202 patients with neurosurgi-cal or neurological diseases. Each assessment was completed independently and within 1 minute. Partici-pants had no knowledge of the others’ assessments. Results: agreement between Glasgow Coma Scale component and sum scores recorded by the 2 researchers ranged from 89.5% to 95.9% (P = .001). Significant agreement among nurses and the 2 researchers was found for eye response (73.8%), motor response (75.0%), verbal response (68.1%), and sum scores (62.4%) (all P = .001). Significant agreement among nurses and the 2 researchers (55.2%) was also found for sum scores of patients with sum scores of 10 or less (P = .03). Conclusions: although the study showed near-perfect agreement between the 2 researchers’ Glasgow Coma Scale scores, agreement among nurses and the 2 researchers was moderate (not near perfect) for sub-component and sum scores. Accurate Glasgow Coma Scale evaluation requires that intensive care unit nurses have adequate knowledge and skills. Educational strategies such as simulations or orientation practice with a preceptor nurse can help develop such skills.
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    Cigarette smoking cessation counselling in pregnant smokers with mental illness/substance use disorders
    (Sage, 2022) Hall, Lynne A.; Hall, Martin T.; Salameh, Taghreed Nayel Mohammad; Faculty Member; School of Nursing; 329120
    Our objective was to determine if past-year mental illness and substance use disorders (SUD) among pregnant smokers predicted the probability of receipt of counselling for cigarette smoking cessation. A secondary analysis of data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health 2016-2019 was conducted. We found that approximately 83% of pregnant smokers (N = 373) received screening for cigarette smoking, and 65% received cessation counselling. Having mental illness predicted the probability of receipt of counselling for smoking cessation in pregnant smokers (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 3.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-11.27). However, having SUD (alcohol [AOR: 2.30; 95%CI: 0.57-9.26] or illicit drug use [AOR: 1.32; 95%CI: 0.26-6.82]) or comorbid mental illness and SUD (AOR: 0.23; 95%CI: 0.03-2.03) was not associated with receipt of counselling for smoking cessation. Practice guidelines and policy initiatives are needed to reduce cigarette use and its related adverse health outcomes in pregnant smokers with SUD.
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    Does being a cancer patient or family caregiver of a cancer patient affect stem cell donation awareness?
    (Medknow Publications, 2020) Özen, Nurten; Bayrak, Damla; Çınar, Fatma İlknur; Bağçivan, Gülcan; Faculty Member; School of Nursing
    Objective: one of the most difficult challenges regarding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Turkey is finding donors for allogeneic transplantation candidates who do not have related donors. This study aims to determine whether there is any difference in the awareness of stem cell donation and transplantation between cancer and noncancer patients and their family caregivers. In addition, this study aims to determine the awareness of stem cell donation and transplantation in the entire study population. Methods: this descriptive study was conducted in Turkey using a data collection form comprising questions about demographics, stem cell transplantations, donations, and medical history. On analyzing the research data, variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and as numbers (n) and percentages (%). The Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were performed to evaluate differences among cancer and noncancer diagnosed patients and their family members. Results: a total of 192 patients and 169 family caregivers participated in the study. In comparison with noncancer patients, cancer patients showed more awareness on what stem cell transplantation is, how lifesaving it is, and how to donate stem cells. Similarly, the family caregivers of cancer patients were more aware of what stem cell transplantation is and how to donate stem cells. Conclusions: the results of this study showed that cancer patients and their families were more aware of stem cell donation and transplantation; however, most of the patients and families did not know enough about the national registry program and how to donate stem cells.