Research Outputs
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/2
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Publication Metadata only Cosmetic products and women's health(Gülhane Military Medical Academy / Gülhane Askeri Tıp Akademisi, 2014) Kocaöz, Semra; N/A; Eroğlu, Kafiye; Faculty Member; School of Nursing; 6061Due to their various effects, today cosmetic products are indispensable products of modern society. These products which are generally used without considering chemical material in their content and whose target group are generally women influence health negatively when they are used unconsciously. In this paper, the effect of chemical materials in the content of cosmetic products which should be used with legal arrangements on women health was analyzed through recent studies and it was aimed to analyze awareness of society, especially women, about cosmetic products.Publication Metadata only Development, validity and reliability of the 4-point likert Turkish version of cognitive failures questionnaire(İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, 2020) Aydemir, Ömer; N/A; Eser, Hale Yapıcı; Yalçınay-İnan, Merve; Küçüker, Mehmet Utku; Kılçıksız, Can Mişel; Yılmaz, Sezen Güçlü; Dinçer, Neris; Kılıç, Özge; Ercan, Alaattin Cenk; Faculty Member; Doctor; Researcher; Researcher; Undergraduate Student; Undergraduate Student; Doctor; Doctor; School of Medicine; N/A; School of Medicine; School of Medicine; School of Medicine; School of Medicine; School of Medicine; N/A; Koç University Hospital; 134359; N/A; N/A; N/A; N/A; 349025; N/A; N/AAim: Cognitive failures are suggested to be a transdiagnostic endophenotype that increases the vulnerability for psychiatric disorders. Broadbent’s Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), is among the most widely used scales to assess cognitive function observed in an ecological manner. Despite its wide use in research and correlation with biological markers, CFQ is criticized for its unstable factorial structure among studies and 5-Likert structure that may lead to bias for neutral answers. Here we aimed to develop a 4-Likert Turkish version of CFQ, search its validity, reliability and factorial structure. Material and Methods: CFQ has been translated to Turkish in two steps. CFQ, Perceived Deficit Questionnaire-D (PDQ-D), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were applied to 272 participants (187 healthy controls, 55 patients diagnosed with depression, 30 patients diagnosed with anxiety disorder). Results: The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 4-Likert Turkish version of CFQ was found as 0.91. Principal component analysis extracted five factors and explained 53.7 % of total variance. CFQ scores were significantly different among groups. Both depressive and anxious groups reported higher CFQ scores compared to controls. CFQ significantly and strongly correlated with PDQ-D and showed a moderate correlation with BDI and BAI. Conclusion: 4-Likert Turkish version of CFQ is a valid and reliable tool to assess cognitive failures in non-demented groups. Our analysis revealed a five factorial structure for CFQ, however previous literature with the 5-Likert version shows different factor structures and does not indicate a dimensional stability.Publication Metadata only Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Snaith-Hamilton pleasure scale(Association for Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies, 2020) Aydemir, Ömer; N/A; N/A; N/A; N/A; N/A; N/A; N/A; N/A; Eser, Hale Yapıcı; Yalçınay-İnan, Merve; Küçüker, Mehmet Utku; Kılçıksız, Can Mişel; Yılmaz, Sezen Güçlü; Dinçer, Neris; Kılıç, Özge; Ercan, Alaattin Cenk; Faculty Member; Doctor; Researcher; Researcher; Undergraduate Student; Undergraduate Student; Doctor; Doctor; Koç University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM) / Koç Üniversitesi Translasyonel Tıp Araştırma Merkezi (KUTTAM); School of Medicine; N/A; School of Medicine; School of Medicine; School of Medicine; School of Medicine; School of Medicine; N/A; Koç University Hospital; 134359; N/A; N/A; N/A; N/A; 349025; N/A; N/AAnhedonia is a core feature of many psychiatric disorders and its reliable evaluation is needed for the dimensional understanding of psychiatric disorders. Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) is one of the most widely used scales to assess anhedonia. Here, we aimed to search the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of SHAPS. Translation of the original scale was completed in a two-step procedure. 188 healthy controls, 56 patients with a depressive disorder (F32-F34, excluding F34.0 cyclothymic disorder, according to ICD-10), and 52 patients with anxiety, stress-related or somatoform disorder diagnoses (F40-49 diagnosis according to ICD-10) were recruited, and evaluated with the Turkish version of SHAPS, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R). For the Turkish version of SHAPS, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was found 0.87. The item-total item correlation indices ranged from 0.39 to 0.64. Principal components analysis extracted two factors and explained 46.57 % of total variance. The most significant correlation of SHAPS was found with BDI and depression subscale of SCL-90-R scores. SHAPS also weakly but significantly correlated with obsessive compulsive and anxiety subscales of SCL-90-R, and weakly but non-significantly with BAI and somatization, interpersonal sensitivity, hostility and psychoticism subscales of SCL-90-R. Depressive group had significantly higher SHAPS scores compared to controls and anxious group. Anxious group and control group were not significantly different for SHAPS scores. The current study shows that the Turkish version of the SHAPS has good psychometric properties. SHAPS scores may correlate with depression, somatization, and interpersonal sensitivity scores, and it may help to differentiate depressive patients from anxious patients and controls. /Öz: Anhedoni, birçok psikiyatrik bozukluğun temel bir özelliğidir ve psikiyatrik bozuklukların boyutsal olarak anlaşılması için güvenilir bir şekilde değerlendirilmesi gerekir. Snaith-Hamilton Keyif Alma Ölçeği (SHKÖ), anhedoniyi değerlendirmek için en yaygın kullanılan ölçeklerden biridir. Burada, SHKÖ’nün Türkçe versiyonunun geçerliliği ve güvenilirliğinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Orijinal ölçeğin çevirisi iki aşamalı bir prosedürle tamamlanmıştır. 188 sağlıklı kontrol, 56 depresif bozukluk (ICD-10’a göre F34.0 (siklotimi) dışında F32-F34 tanıları almış kişiler) ve 52 anksiyete, stres ilişkili veya somatoform bozukluk tanısı almış olan anksiyöz hasta (ICD-10’a göre F40-49 tanıları almış kişiler) çalışmaya alınmıştır. Katılımcılar SHKÖ’nün Türkçe versiyonu, Beck Depresyon Envanteri (BDE), Beck Anksiyete Envanteri (BAE) ve Belirti Kontrol Listesi-90-Gözden Geçirilmiş Form (SCL-90-R) ile değerlendirilmiştir. SHKÖ’nün Türkçe versiyonu için Cronbach alfa katsayısı 0,87 olarak bulunmuştur. Madde-toplam madde korelasyon endeksleri 0,39 ile 0,64 arasında değişmiştir. Temel bileşenler analizi iki faktörü ortaya çıkarmış ve toplam varyansın % 46,57‘ sini açıklamıştır. En yüksek SHKÖ korelasyonu BDE ve SCL-90-R‘nin depresyon alt ölçeği skorları ile bulunmuştur. SHKÖ ayrıca SCL-90-R‘nin obsesif kompulsif ve anksiyete alt ölçekleri ile zayıf fakat istatiksel olarak anlamlı bir korelasyon gösterirken, SCL-90- R‘nin somatizasyon, kişilerarası duyarlılık, hostilite ve psikotisizm alt ölçekleri ile zayıf fakat istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmayan bir ilişki göstermiştir. Depresif hasta grubunda kontrol grubuna ve anksiyöz hasta grubuna göre anlamlı derecede yüksek SHKÖ skorları saptanmıştır. Anksiyöz hasta grubu ve kontrol grubu, SHKÖ skorları için farklı bulunmamıştır. Bu çalışma, SHKÖ’nün Türkçe versiyonunun iyi psikometrik özellikleri olduğunu göstermektedir. SHKÖ puanları depresyon, somatizasyon ve kişilerarası duyarlılık puanları ile ilişkili olabilir ve depresif hastaları anksiyöz hastalardan ve kontrollerden ayırmada yardımcı olabilir.