Research Outputs
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/2
Browse
5 results
Search Results
Publication Open Access A principle of universal strife: Ricoeur and Merleau-Ponty's critiques of Marxist universalism, 1953-1956(University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015) Department of Philosophy; Chouraqui, Frank; Faculty Member; Department of Philosophy; College of Social Sciences and HumanitiesPublication Metadata only Business, ethics and institutions the evolution of Turkish capitalism in a comparative perspective(Routledge, 2020) Jones, Geoffrey; N/A; Çolpan, Aslı M.; Other; College of Administrative Sciences and Economics; N/AN/APublication Metadata only Development of business groups and entrepreneurship the Koc Group in global perspective(Routledge, 2020) Jones, Geoffrey; N/A; Çolpan, Aslı M.; Other; College of Administrative Sciences and Economics; N/AN/APublication Metadata only Ethics and corruption contrasting perspectives of the general public and business community in Turkey(Routledge, 2020) Department of International Relations; Çarkoğlu, Ali; Faculty Member; Department of International Relations; Koç University Center for Survey Research (KUCSR) / Koç Üniversitesi Saha Araştırmaları Merkezi (KUSAM); College of Administrative Sciences and Economics; 125588N/APublication Open Access Phenomenology and ethics: from value theory to an ethics of responsibility(Philosophy Documentation Center, 2014) DeWit, David J.; DuBois, David; Larose, Simon; Lipman, Ellen L.; Spencer, Renee; Department of Philosophy; Direk, Zeynep; Faculty Member; Department of Philosophy; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; 5771There seems to be a shift in phenomenology in the 20th century from an ethics based on value theory to an ethics based on responsibility. This essay attempts to show the path marks of this transition. It begins with the historical development that led Husserl to address the question of ethical objectivity in terms of value theory, with a focus on Kant, Hegel, and Nietzsche. It then explains Husserl’s phenomenology of ethics as grounded in value theory, and takes into account Heidegger’s objections to it. Finally, it considers Sartre as a transitional fi gure between value theory and an ethics of responsibility and attempts to show in what sense, if at all, Levinas’ phenomenology of ethics could be an absolute break with a phenomenological ethics based on values.