Research Outputs
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/2
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Publication Open Access A longitudinal analysis of customer satisfaction and share of wallet: investigating the moderating effect of customer characteristics(American Marketing Association (AMA), 2007) Cooil, B.; Keiningham, T. L.; Hsu, M.; Department of Business Administration; Aksoy, Lerzan; Faculty Member; Department of Business Administration; College of Administrative Sciences and EconomicsCustomer loyalty is an important strategic objective for all managers. Research has investigated the relationship between custom̀er satisfaction and loyalty in various contexts. However, these predominantly cross-sectional studies have focused on customer retention as the primary measure of loyalty. There has been little investigation into the impact on share of wallet. Using data from the Canadian banking industry, this research aims to (1) provide the first longitudinal examination of the impact of changes in customer satisfaction on changes in share of wallet and (2) determine the moderating effects of customer age, income, education, expertise, and length of relationship. Data from 4319 households using 12,249 observations over a five-year period indicate a positive relationship between changes in satisfaction and share of wallet. In particular, the initial satisfaction level and the conditional percentile of change in satisfaction significantly correspond to changes in share of wallet. Two variables, income and length of the relationship, negatively moderate this relationship. Other demographic and situational characteristics have no impact.Publication Open Access A longitudinal examination of net promoter and firm revenue growth(American Marketing Association (AMA), 2007) Keiningham, Timothy L.; Cooil, Bruce; Andreassen, Tor Wallin; Department of Business Administration; Aksoy, Lerzan; Faculty Member; Department of Business Administration; College of Administrative Sciences and EconomicsManagers have widely embraced and adopted the Net Promoter metric, which noted loyalty consultant Frederick Reichheld advocates as the single most reliable indicator of firm growth compared with other loyalty metrics, such as customer satisfaction and retention. Recently, however, there has been considerable debate about whether this metric is truly superior. This article (1) employs longitudinal data from 21 firms and 15,500-plus interviews from the Norwegian Customer Satisfaction Barometer to replicate the analyses used in Net Promoter research and (2) compares Reichheld and colleagues' findings with the American Customer Satisfaction Index. Using industries Reichheld cites as exemplars of Net Promoter, the research fails to replicate his assertions regarding the "clear superiority" of Net Promoter compared with other measures in those industries.Publication Open Access The long-term stock market valuation of customer satisfaction(American Marketing Association (AMA), 2008) Cooil B., Groening C., Keiningham T. L.; Yalçın, Atakan; Department of Business Administration; Aksoy, Lerzan; Faculty Member; Department of Business Administration; College of Administrative Sciences and EconomicsFirm valuation has been an important domain of interest for finance. However, most financial models do not include customer-related metrics in this process. Studies in marketing have found that one particular customer metric, customer satisfaction, improves the ability to predict future cash flows, long-term financial measures, stock performance, and shareholder value. However, most of these studies predominantly employ models that are not directly used in finance practice. This article extends existing literature by examining the impact of customer satisfaction on firm valuation by employing multiples and risk-adjusted abnormal return models borrowed directly from the practice of finance. Data include 3600 firm-quarter observations from the American Customer Satisfaction Index, COMPUSTAT, and Center for Research in Securities Prices databases from 1996 to 2006. The results indicate that a portfolio of stocks consisting of firms with high levels and positive changes in customer satisfaction will outperform the other three possible portfolio combinations (low levels and negative changes, low levels and positive changes, and high levels and negative changes in customer satisfaction) along with Standard & Poor's 500. Initially, the stock market undervalues positive satisfaction information, but the market adjusts in the long run.