Research Outputs

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/2

Browse

Filters

2008 - 200912010 - 20152

Advanced Search

Filter by

Settings

Sponsors: search.filters.sponsors.N/ASubject: search.filters.subject.Ethics

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Placeholder
    PublicationMetadata only
    A personal ethics responsibility example: the relationship between child development and drugs taken by pregnant mother
    (TÜBİTAK, 2008) Üstün, Çağatay; Department of International Relations; Özgürler, Özge; Undergraduate Student; Department of International Relations; College of Administrative Sciences and Economics; N/A
    Kişisel sorumluluk önemli bir etik kavramdır. Bu durumda hamile anne birincil derecede önem arz etmektedir. Hamile anne kendisinin ve bebeğin sağlığının korumak, bebeğin normal gelişimini temin etmek için bazı şeylere dikkat etmelidir. Bu anlamda ilaçların hamile annenin bebeği üzerindeki genel etkilerine değineceğiz. Böylece annelerin kişisel etik sorumluluğunu vurgulamayı hedefliyoruz.
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    A principle of universal strife: Ricoeur and Merleau-Ponty's critiques of Marxist universalism, 1953-1956
    (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015) Department of Philosophy; Chouraqui, Frank; Faculty Member; Department of Philosophy; College of Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    Phenomenology and ethics: from value theory to an ethics of responsibility
    (Philosophy Documentation Center, 2014) DeWit, David J.; DuBois, David; Larose, Simon; Lipman, Ellen L.; Spencer, Renee; Department of Philosophy; Direk, Zeynep; Faculty Member; Department of Philosophy; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; 5771
    There seems to be a shift in phenomenology in the 20th century from an ethics based on value theory to an ethics based on responsibility. This essay attempts to show the path marks of this transition. It begins with the historical development that led Husserl to address the question of ethical objectivity in terms of value theory, with a focus on Kant, Hegel, and Nietzsche. It then explains Husserl’s phenomenology of ethics as grounded in value theory, and takes into account Heidegger’s objections to it. Finally, it considers Sartre as a transitional fi gure between value theory and an ethics of responsibility and attempts to show in what sense, if at all, Levinas’ phenomenology of ethics could be an absolute break with a phenomenological ethics based on values.