Research Outputs
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/2
Browse
170 results
Filters
Advanced Search
Filter by
Settings
Search Results
Publication Open Access 1899 yılı Osmanlı İmparatorluğu için jeomekansal ve çok modlu bir ulaşım ağı oluşturma denemesi(Koç University Research Center for Anatolian Civilizations (ANAMED) / Koç Üniversitesi Anadolu Medeniyetleri Araştırma Merkezi (ANAMED), 2020) Gerrits, Piet; Department of History; Kabadayı, Mustafa Erdem; Özkan, Osman; Koçak, Turgay; Faculty Member; Teaching Faculty; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; 33267; N/A; N/A
Publication Metadata only A historical sociology of disability: human validity and invalidity from antiquity to early modernity(Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd, 2022) N/A; Bozkurt, Ozancan; Master Student; Graduate School of Social Sciences and Humanities; N/AN/APublication Metadata only A metal workshop? Multi-hollow anvils at Taştepe obası in southeastern Konya(Brill, 2017) N/A; Department of Archeology and History of Art; Maner, Çiğdem; Faculty Member; Department of Archeology and History of Art; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; 104427During the first campaign of the Konya Ereğli Survey Project (keyar) in 2013, c. 12 km north of the Bolkar Mountains, a site called Taştepe Obası just north of the village of Çayhan was surveyed. In between domestic houses and in the field of Taştepe Obası, four large stones with man-made small circular depressions were discovered. These rocks, known as multi-hollow anvils or multi-hollow mortars, are important indications that metal ores were dressed here. The proximity to the metal-rich Bolkar Mountains might indicate the presence of a metal workshop. Very similar multi-hollow anvils have been discovered in the vicinity of the Kestel mine, where they were used for ore dressing of cassiterite, the first stage in the preparation of the ore for the smelting process. This article will introduce the site of Taştepe Obası and consider it in the context of ancient metal workshops in the region and the mining activities in the Bolkar Mountains.Publication Open Access A new funerary inscription from Olympos (Lycia) and an addendum to TAM II 1075(Phaselis Research Station / Phaselis Araştırma İstasyonu, 2021) Department of Archeology and History of Art; Demirhan Öztürk, Ezgi; Faculty Member; Department of Archeology and History of Art; Graduate School of Social Sciences and HumanitiesThis paper presents two funerary inscriptions found in Olympos, one of which has not been pub-lished before (no. 1). The inscription dated to the Ist-IInd centuries A.D. was recorded in 2015, and it belongs to the tomb of Arteimas and his family. Another funerary inscription (no. 2) was published with the number 1075 in TAM II, and we make an addendum to the published inscription. The rest of the inscription belong-ing to the tomb of Pausanias was noticed in 2015 in the course of a survey and the remaining five lines of this inscription were recorded with the inv. No. 37. / : Bu makalede Olympos'ta bulunan ve biri daha önce yayınlanmamış (no. 1) ve diğer yazıta (no. 2) addendum yapılmış iki mezar yazıtı tanıtılmaktadır. MS I-II. yüzyıllara tarihlenen bir numaralı yazıt 2015 yılında kaydedilmiş olup, yazıt Arteimas ve ailesinin mezarına aittir. Bir diğer mezar yazıtı olan (no. 2) TAM II'de 1075 numara ile yayımlanmış olup; yazıta tarafımızdan bir addendum yapılmıştır. Yazıtın geri kalanı 2015 yılında bir kontrol sırasında fark edilmiş ve geri kalan beş satır tarafımızdan yeniden kaydedilmiştir, yazıt Pausanias'ın mezarına aittir.Publication Metadata only A new pilgrimage site at late antique Ephesus transfer of religious ideas in Western Asia Minor(Brill, 2020) N/A; Sewing, Katinka; Researcher; N/A; Koç University Research Center for Anatolian Civilizations (ANAMED) / Anadolu Medeniyetleri Araştırma Merkezi (ANAMED); N/AN/APublication Open Access A preliminary attempt to construct a geospatial, multimodal Ottoman transport network for 1899(Koç University Press (KUP) / Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları (KÜY), 2021) Gerrits, Piet; Department of History; Kabadayı, Mustafa Erdem; Özkan, Osman; Koçak, Turgay; Faculty Member; Teaching Faculty; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; 33267; N/A; N/APublication Open Access A principle of universal strife: Ricoeur and Merleau-Ponty's critiques of Marxist universalism, 1953-1956(University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015) Department of Philosophy; Chouraqui, Frank; Faculty Member; Department of Philosophy; College of Social Sciences and HumanitiesPublication Metadata only A reevaluation for the Genoese period of the Galata Tower(Suna ve İnan Kıraç Vakfı Kültür ve Sanat İşletmesi, 2020) N/A; Sağlam, Hasan Sercan; Researcher; Koç University Research Center for Anatolian Civilizations (ANAMED) / Anadolu Medeniyetleri Araştırma Merkezi (ANAMED); N/A; N/AThe Galata Tower has been witness to many historical events and has gone through multiple architectural phases over the course of its long life. Its Genoese origins began to receive scholarly attention particularly in the late eighteenth century and especially during the nineteenth century. In the meantime, a general consensus was reached about the history and architecture of the tower's Genoese period. However, this consensus was actually based on a few primary sources without any comprehensive approaches nor in-depth investigation. The tower's erroneous name, "Tower of Christ" (Christea Turris), during its Genoese period is perhaps the most widespread assumption in the secondary literature. A first construction by Anastasios I and a heightening around 1445/1446 are further related misconceptions. Despite the popularity of Galata as a research topic, these misconceptions have become anonymous and continuously repeated without being questioned. Moreover, slightly different arguments for the tower were put forward. In particular, when compared to later periods of the monument, the former name of the tower, its alleged Byzantine past, and especially the Genoese architectural identity of the present structure remain rather ambiguous in the light of all the arguments in the literature. For these reasons, this article presents a fundamental reevaluation for the Genoese period of the Galata Tower through virtually all of the primary sources and a small architectural survey. This article shows that there is no solid evidence of the supposed Byzantine period of the tower; that it was named as the "Tower of Holy Cross" (Turris Sancte Crucis) by the Genoese who built it, and its first structural alteration was probably executed by the Ottomans around 1453. / Galata Kulesi’nin uzun yaşamı, birçok tarihî olaya ve mimari evreye tanıklık etmiştir. Bu doğrultuda kuleye yönelik bilimsel araştırmalar on sekizinci yüzyılın sonunda ve özellikle on dokuzuncu yüzyılda yoğunlaşmış, yapının Ceneviz dönemi ve öncesine ilişkin başlıca argümanlar bu süreçte şekillenmiştir. Lakin başvurulan sınırlı sayıdaki birincil kaynak, kapsamlı bir bakış açısıyla ele alınmamış, bazı noktalar üstünkörü yorumlanmıştır. Bunlar arasında belki de en yaygın olanı, kulenin Ceneviz dönemindeki adının ikincil kaynaklarca yanlış bir şekilde “İsa Kulesi” (Christea Turris) zannedilmesidir. İlk inşasının I. Anastasios tarafından yapılması ve Ceneviz döneminde 1445–1446 civarında yükseltilmesi ise diğer yanılgılardır. Tüm bu görüşler, Galata’nın artık alışılmış akademik popülerliğine karşın pek sorgulanmamış ve zamanla anonimleşerek kuleye dair temel bilgilere dönüşmüştür. Bu esnada farklı birincil kaynaklar irdelenerek başka iddialar da öne sürülmüş ve sonuç olarak kuleye yönelik bilgilerde birtakım ikilikler ortaya çıkmıştır. Öyle ki, Galata Kulesi’nin Ceneviz öncesi dönemi, Ceneviz dönemindeki adı ve bunların yanında özellikle de mevcut yapının bu dönemden geriye kaldığı düşünülen kısmı, literatürdeki tüm argümanların ışığında ve anıtın daha sonraki dönemlerine kıyasla bir hayli muğlaktır. Dolayısıyla bu makale, Galata Kulesi’nin Ceneviz döneminin, tarihî ve mimari açılardan temel düzeyde bir yeniden değerlendirmesidir. Kayda değer bulgularsa kulenin Bizans dönemine uzanan bir geçmişi olduğuna dair ortada somut hiçbir verinin bulunmadığı; inşa edildiği Ceneviz dönemindeki isminin yalnızca “Kutsal Haç Kulesi” (Turris Sancte Crucis) olduğu ve ilk yapısal değişikliğini de Osmanlılar tarafından 1453 dolaylarında geçirdiğine işaret etmektedir.Publication Metadata only A tale of ambiguity: citizenship, nationalism and democracy in Turkey(Wiley-Blackwell, 2011) Keyman, Emin Fuat; Department of International Relations; Kancı, Tuba; Researcher; Department of International Relations; College of Administrative Sciences and Economics; N/AWe argue that historically the official Turkish nationalism and citizenship regime have been marked by an ambiguity that arises from the simultaneous existence of - and repeatedly occurring swings between - the ethno-centric and civic-political understandings of citizenship. We also suggest that the concept of territoriality, which took precedence over other factors in the creation of a new state in 1923, has functioned as a hegemonic reference in the official conceptualisations of the Turkish nation and self. The territorial focus, over time, has been conflated with the ethnic conceptualisations of the nation: both become the underlining elements of the discourse of official nationalism in Turkey, and are utilised in the successive reformulations of citizenship into the 2000s. Through the analysis of schoolbooks and curricula, we further argue that the major oscillations in nationalism nevertheless coincided with the ruptures that characterised the making of modern Turkey: modernisation, democratisation, globalisation and Europeanisation.Publication Metadata only A tale of two cities: Thebes and Chalcis in a world of change (ninth to fifteenth centuries)(Taylor and Francis, 2021) Department of Archeology and History of Art; Kontogiannis, Nikolaos; Faculty Member; Department of Archeology and History of Art; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; 258781Central Greece during the Byzantine era has often been summarily and perhaps simplistically considered by earlier historians as a primarily agrarian backwater, coming to forefront only. Chalcis gradually came under Venetian rule, and served as an international maritime colony. These divergent political conditions also gradually influenced the civic conditions and the urban fabric of both cities. Between the ninth and the twelfth centuries, the “special bond” between two cities was achieved through a matrix of economic, social, and political features, which can be traced down to the level of urban neighbourhoods. In both cities, similar patterns emerge on the basis of material culture and the concentration of activities. The establishment and continuous use of Byzantine neighbourhoods despite the deficiencies in our knowledge of their boundaries, organization, and exact size seem to represent a conscious choice on the part of the inhabitants. Defensive walls played a primary role, defining the walled area as primary and that outside the walls as secondary.