Organizational Unit: Department of History
Loading...
Date established
City
Country
ID
Is Parent Of
Is Child Of
ROR Identifier
Description
135 results
Filters
Advanced Search
Filter by
Settings
Publication Search Results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 135
Publication Metadata only Turkish literature(Springer, 2018) Parla, Jale; Department of History; Department of Comparative Literature; Ertem, Özge; Uslu, Mehmet Fatih; Teaching Faculty; Faculty Member; Department of History; Department of Comparative Literature; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; N/A; 37406My basic thesis about the cultural and epistemological significance of the theme of the fathers and sons has not changed over the years. The quest for a father as absolute authority continued to inform Turkish thought and literature, with only a few exceptional interludes as with the novels of the 1970s. It is, I feel, a mind-numbingly uninteresting phenomenon. Why? Because it has been the same for centuries-the quest for a father, the readiness to escape from freedom, the insecurity when faced with the possibility of a fatherless vacuum, and the need to fill it at all costs. In my subsequent work, I rethought and revisited the Tanzimat (Reorganization) period of 1839-1876, and I came to realize that certain themes that persist in the literary and cultural spheres-modernization, Westernization, issues concerning language reform-were taken up and debated much more judiciously and liberally back then, particularly when compared to the sectarian, prejudiced, and hostile debates of later periods. In this respect, I draw the line with the Servet-i Fünun (Wealth of Knowledge) period of 1891-1901, during which cultural and literary quarrels became harsher and were carried into the partisan disputes of the Republican era.Publication Metadata only Ethno-religious division of labour in urban economie s of the Ottoman Empire in the nineteenth century(Berghahn Books, 2020) Güvenç, Murat; Department of History; Kabadayı, Mustafa Erdem; Faculty Member; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; 33267N/APublication Metadata only Between lames Bond and losif Stalin(Slavica Publishers, 2020) Department of History; Amar, Tarık Youssef Cyril; Other; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; 294014Publication Metadata only Nation-state structures of Turkey and Romania in interwar period and their regional reflections(Hacettepe University, 2022) Department of History; Emek, Berk; PhD Student; Department of History; Graduate School of Social Sciences and Humanities; N/AThis article discusses the state-building policies during interwar period in Turkey and Romania and the impact of the security-based risk perception on domestic policy. The nationalizing politics that emerged in the economical, political and social fields in line with the establishment and consolidation of the nation-state structure in both countries is evaluated from a comparative perspective. Turkey and Romania aimed at promoting regional and international peace during the given period. However, in a process where nation-states were established and security of the borders was sensitive, the relations between groups living in multi-ethnic regions and the central administration changed generally on the basis of the security concerns. Turkey and Romania, which are treated in the nationalising state category in the literature on interwar period, have followed the politics of centralization in line with regional risks and worked to strengthen the state authority in the multi-ethnic borderlands, namely Eastern Anatolia and Transylvania. The article is composed of three parts. In the first section, the concept of nationalizing state is explained, and Turkey and Romania are evaluated within this term. In the second part, the threat posed by the rising revisionism in Europe, the measures developed in return, and the role of the League of Nations are discussed. Last but not least, based on the analysis of Eastern Anatolia and Transylvania regions, it is discussed to what extent security risks were reflected in state policies in Turkey and Romania together with their results. Based on archives in Turkey, Romania, and the United Kingdom, it is revealed that revisionist targets as well as security risks related to political problems increased the centralization efforts of Turkey and Romania and shaped their official state policies on the axis of security. © 2022, Hacettepe University. All rights reserved.Publication Metadata only Revisiting the Britain-US-Turkey triangle during the transition from Pax Britannica to Pax Americana (1947-1957)(Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2020) Guvenc, Serhat; Department of History; Department of International Relations; Barlas, Dilek; Yılmaz, Şuhnaz Özbağcı; Faculty Member; Faculty Member; Department of History; Department of International Relations; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; College of Administrative Sciences and Economics; 4172; 46805This article analyses the triangular relations between Britain, the United States and Turkey in the volatile Middle East and Eastern Mediterranean region at the advent of the Cold War. It examines the political, economic and military strategies that enabled Turkey to adapt to the transitional period from the Pax Britannica to the Pax Americana (1947-1957) in the Middle East and the Eastern Mediterranean. By focusing on this turbulent decade extending from the Truman Doctrine (1947) to the Eisenhower Doctrine (1957), this study posits that the transition from the waning influence of Britain to the coalitional hegemony of the United States was protracted and multi-layered. In this context, Turkey had to walk a diplomatic tightrope while managing certain aspects of continuity and change in a volatile region.Publication Metadata only The small, the big, and the ugly: persistent challenges of thinking about lviv's Ukrainization(Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2020) Department of History; Amar, Tarık Youssef Cyril; Other; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; 294014Publication Metadata only The historiography of dreaming in medieval Byzantium(Ashgate Publishing, 2014) N/A; Department of History; Magdalino, Paul; Faculty Member; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; N/AN/APublication Metadata only Rethinking nationalism - state projects and community networks in 19th-century Ottoman Empire(Sage Publications Inc, 2008) N/A; Department of History; Köksal, Yonca; Faculty Member; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; 53333This article challenges the idea that a centralized administrative infrastructure, a common citizenship, and the resulting national belonging run in the same direction in state transformations. Comparing two Ottoman provinces of Edirne and Ankara, the author argues that community networks influence local responses to administrative centralization and national identity formation. In the province of Edirne, dense communal networks that bridged religious and ethnic boundaries maintained local cooperation with state centralization, whereas dense relations within religious and ethnic communities contributed to the failure of the formation of Ottoman national identity. In the province of Ankara, the lack of dense relations connecting different communities prevented reform success in both administrative and ideological dimensions.Publication Metadata only Milletler Cemiyeti’nde Türkiye: iyimserlik ve kuşku arasında(Uluslararası İlişkiler Konseyi Derneği, 2017) Department of History; Barlas, Dilek; Faculty Member; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; 4172This article discusses Turkey’s activities after its membership to the League of Nations in 1932 and especially to the Council in 1934 and its ambivalent position towards to the League. This work is based on the archival documents on Turkey at the League of Nations’ Archives in Switzerland. Even though bulk of documents on Turkey has not been classified yet, collection presently available is sufficient to reflect the ambivalent position of Ankara towards the League in the interwar era. Ankara believed that the League could contribute a great deal to the world peace but at the same time it questioned the implementation of its principles. / Bu makale, 1932 yılında Türkiye’nin Milletler Cemiyeti’ne özellikle de 1934 yılında Konsey’e üye olduktan sonraki faaliyetlerini ve Cemiyet’e yönelik ikircikli tutumunu ele almaktadır. Çalışma esasen İsviçre’nin Cenevre kentinde bulunan Milletler Cemiyeti Arşivi’ndeki belgelere dayanmaktadır. Ulusal arşivlere oranla mütevazı sayılabilecek bir koleksiyona sahip olmakla beraber mevcut belgeler, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin katıldığı ilk uluslararası örgüt olan Milletler Cemiyeti’ndeki faaliyetleri, Ankara’nın iki savaş arası dönemde uluslararası ilişkilere bakışını ve tavrını büyük ölçüde yansıtmaktadır. Türkiye’nin Milletler Cemiyeti’ne yaklaşımı ikircikliydi. Ankara bir yandan özüne uygun biçimde uygulandığı takdirde Cemiyet’in ilkelerinin dünya barışına katkıda bulunacağı inanmakta, öte taraftan da bu ilkeler bir türlü yaşama geçirilemediği için Cemiyet’in işleyişini sorgulamaktaydı.Publication Metadata only Great catastrophe: Armenians and Turks in the shadow of genocide(Cambridge Univ Press, 2018) Department of History; Polatel, Mehmet; Researcher; Department of History; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; N/A