Researcher:
Küçük, Bermal

Loading...
Profile Picture
ORCID

Job Title

PhD Student

First Name

Bermal

Last Name

Küçük

Name

Name Variants

Küçük, Bermal

Email Address

Birth Date

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Placeholder
    Publication
    The processes for creating value in natural food production in contemporary Turkey
    (İstanbul Üniversitesi, 2020) N/A; N/A; Küçük, Bermal; PhD Student; Graduate School of Social Sciences and Humanities; N/A
    Turkey has a niche market based on healthy food consumption that has expanded over the last two decades. This has set the ground for a third sector, the noncertified natural food production that is separate from Certified Organic (CO) and Good Agricultural Practices (GAP). This study examines the value creation mechanisms in Turkey’s natural food production, revealing that women’s knowledge and labor and various discursive strategies appear as the fundamental elements for creating value in the sector. I argue that the creation and dissemination of a particular discourse about natural foods are just as significant as the material production of such food in creating value and accumulating capital. While material production is realized by appropriating women’s labor and knowledge, discursive production is achieved by romanticizing the past. This study is based on empirical data retrieved from a private-run farm located in the Nazilli district of Aydın, Turkey. I conduct in-depth interviews with the owner of the farm and the employees from diverse hierarchical positions. This study is also based on a basic content analysis of the narratives that circulate on the farm’s webpage and email group for trust-building.
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    The rural roots of the rise of the Justice and Development Party in Turkey
    (Taylor _ Francis, 2019) Department of Sociology; Gürel, Burak; Küçük, Bermal; Taş, Sercan; Faculty Member; Department of Sociology; Graduate School of Social Sciences and Humanities; 219277; N/A; N/A
    This paper puts forward four main arguments regarding the persistence of significant rural support of the Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalknma Partisi, AKP) in Turkey since late 2002. Firstly, since the previous coalition government implemented the harshest neoliberal measures in the agricultural sector, small farmers do not directly associate neoliberal assault with the AKP administration. Secondly, villagers have utilized both the ballot box and direct action in order to bargain with the AKP. Thirdly, although the AKP government did not fundamentally depart from neoliberalism, the return of agricultural subsidies, significant expansion of social assistance, and rapid infrastructure construction have secured a large rural following for the party. Finally, the AKP government has effectively used coercive methods to prevent the emergence of an emancipatory political alternative.
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    Land occupation as a form of peasant struggle in Turkey, 1965-1980
    (Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2022) Taş, Sercan; Department of Sociology; Gürel, Burak; Küçük, Bermal; Faculty Member; Department of Sociology; College of Social Sciences and Humanities; Graduate School of Social Sciences and Humanities; 219277; N/A
    This article contributes to the literature on rural politics in Turkey by investigating peasants' land occupations between 1965 and 1980. We show that agricultural modernization after 1945 created the structural conditions for land conflicts by enabling the reaching of the frontier of cultivable land and facilitating landlords' displacement of tenants. The 1961 Constitution's promise of land reform and the rise of the center-left and socialist politics helped peasants press for land reform by combining direct action and legalistic discourse. Moreover, the vastness of state-owned land and the incompleteness of cadastral records allowed peasants to challenge landlords' ownership claims. During land occupations, villagers often claimed that contested areas were public property illegally encroached upon by landlords, and that the state was constitutionally obliged to distribute it to peasants. Although successive right-wing governments decreed these actions to be intolerable violations of property rights, their practical approach was more flexible and conciliatory. Although nationwide land reform was never realized, land occupations extracted considerable concessions via the distribution of public land and inexpensive land sold by landlords.