Publication:
Comparison of the temporal properties of medium latency responses induced by cortical and peripheral stimulation

dc.contributor.coauthorGöztepe, Mehmet Berke
dc.contributor.coauthorUysal, Hilmi
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.kuauthorÖzyurt, Mustafa Görkem
dc.contributor.kuauthorTürker, Kemal Sıtkı
dc.contributor.kuprofilePhD Student
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGraduate School of Sciences and Engineering
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.contributor.yokid6741
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:47:22Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractSudden foot dorsiflexion lengthens soleus muscle and activates stretch-based spinal reflexes. Dorsiflexion can be triggered by activating tibialis anterior (TA) muscle through peroneal nerve stimulation or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) which evokes a response in the soleus muscle referred to as Medium Latency Reflex (MLR) or motor-evoked potential-80 (Soleus MEP80), respectively. This study aimed to examine the relationship between these responses in humans. Therefore, latency characteristics and correlation of responses between soleus MEP80 and MLR were investigated. We have also calculated the latencies from the onset of tibialis activity, i.e., subtracting of TA-MEP from MEP80 and TA direct motor response from MLR. We referred to these calculations as Stretch Loop Latency Central (SLLc) for MEP80 and Stretch Loop Latency Peripheral (SLLp) for MLR. The latency of SLLc was found to be 61.4 +/- 5.6 ms which was significantly shorter (P = 0.0259) than SLLp (64.0 +/- 4.2 ms) and these latencies were correlated (P = 0.0045, r = 0.689). The latency of both responses was also found to be inversely related to the response amplitude (P = 0.0121, r = 0.451) probably due to the activation of large motor units. When amplitude differences were corrected, i.e. investigating the responses with similar amplitudes, SLLp, and SLLc latencies found to be similar (P = 0.1317). Due to the identical features of the soleus MEP80 and MLR, we propose that they may both have spinal origins.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.volume55
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102477
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5711
dc.identifier.issn1050-6411
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85092692162
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102477
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/14115
dc.identifier.wos593742800002
dc.keywordsTranscranial magnetic stimulation
dc.keywordsMedium latency reflex
dc.keywordsMotor evoked potential
dc.keywordsSpinal circuits
dc.keywordsReflexes magnetic stimulation
dc.keywordsStrerch
dc.keywordsReflex
dc.keywordsMotoneurons
dc.keywordsSpasticity
dc.keywordsProjections
dc.keywordsPotentials
dc.keywordsThreshold
dc.keywordsLeg
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltd
dc.sourceJournal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
dc.subjectNeurosciences
dc.subjectPhysiology
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.subjectSport Sciences
dc.titleComparison of the temporal properties of medium latency responses induced by cortical and peripheral stimulation
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0003-2531-1174
local.contributor.authorid0000-0001-9962-075X
local.contributor.kuauthorÖzyurt, Mustafa Görkem
local.contributor.kuauthorTürker, Kemal Sıtkı

Files