Publication:
Comparison of dusting and fragmentation techniques using an aspiration access sheath: an in vitro study

dc.contributor.coauthorDemirkiran, Engin Denizhan
dc.contributor.coauthorGirgin, Reha
dc.contributor.coauthorKaraarslan, Umut Can
dc.contributor.coauthorKiremit, Murat Can
dc.contributor.coauthorSener, Tarik Emre
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-31T08:20:08Z
dc.date.available2025-12-31
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Suction during flexible ureteroscopy improves stone clearance and lowers complications. The aim of this study is to provide one of the first in vitro comparisons of dusting and fragmentation techniques during laser lithotripsy using an aspiration access sheath. Methods: The bench model consisted of a modified 50-cc syringe that served as a calyx model, into which an 11-13 Fr suction access sheath and artificial BegoStone stones were placed. Three trials were performed by 3 surgeons using Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) for lithotripsy, using both dusting and fragmentation settings and techniques. The primary outcomes were evaluation of energy usage, particle size distribution, procedural efficiency and scope entry-exit count. Results: Fragmentation showed shorter lasing times (31.15 vs 45.15 min, p < 0.001) and greater ablation efficacy (29.64 vs 24.55 mm(3)/J, p < 0.001). Nevertheless, it necessitated longer suction durations (14.11 vs 5.77 min, p = 0.001) due to larger particle sizes and the need for more frequent scope entries (16 vs 4, p < 0.001). Dusting consumed more energy (40.73 vs 33.73 kJ, p < 0.001) but produced finer fragments. Conclusion: Fragmentation using an aspiration sheath shortens the lasing time and improves ablation efficacy, but it also increases the frequency of scope entries and may result in endoscope damage. Dusting produces a finer particle dispersion despite using more energy. The choice of technique should be tailored to the demands of the patient and the surgeon.
dc.description.fulltextYes
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00345-025-05935-4
dc.identifier.eissn1433-8726
dc.identifier.embargoNo
dc.identifier.issn0724-4983
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pubmed40952462
dc.identifier.quartileN/A
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105016275486
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05935-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/31491
dc.identifier.volume43
dc.identifier.wos001572857900005
dc.keywordsThulium fiber laser
dc.keywordsUreteroscopy
dc.keywordsAspiration access sheath
dc.keywordsLaser lithotripsy
dc.keywordsDusting
dc.keywordsFragmentation
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Journal of Urology
dc.relation.openaccessYes
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectUrology & Nephrology
dc.titleComparison of dusting and fragmentation techniques using an aspiration access sheath: an in vitro study
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files