Publication:
European Association of urology biochemical recurrence risk classification as a decision tool for salvage radiotherapy-a multicenter study

Placeholder

Departments

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU-Authors

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Preisser, Felix
Abrams-Pompe, Raisa S.
Stelwagen, Piter Jan
Böhmer, Dirk
Zattoni, Fabio
Magli, Alessandro
Rivas, Juan Gómez
Dilme, Roser Vives
Sepulcri, Matteo
Eguibar, Aritz

Date

Language

Embargo Status

N/A

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Background: The European Association of Urology (EAU) has proposed a risk stratification for patients harboring biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Objective: To assess whether this risk stratification helps in choosing patients for salvage radiotherapy (SRT). Design, setting, and participants: Analyses of 2379 patients who developed BCR after RP (1989–2020), within ten European high-volume centers, were conducted. Early and late SRT were defined as SRT delivered at prostate-specific antigen values <0.5 and ≥0.5 ng/ml, respectively. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Multivariable Cox models tested the effect of SRT versus no SRT on death and cancer-specific death. The Simon-Makuch method tested for survival differences within each risk group. Results and limitations: Overall, 805 and 1574 patients were classified as having EAU low- and high-risk BCR. The median follow-up was 54 mo after BCR for survivors. For low-risk BCR, 12-yr overall survival was 87% versus 78% (p = 0.2) and cancer-specific survival was 100% versus 96% (p = 0.2) for early versus no SRT. For high-risk BCR, 12-yr overall survival was 81% versus 66% (p < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival was 98% versus 82% (p < 0.001) for early versus no SRT. In multivariable analyses, early SRT decreased the risk for death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55, p < 0.01) and cancer-specific death (HR: 0.08, p < 0.001). Late SRT was a predictor of cancer-specific death (HR: 0.17, p < 0.01) but not death (p = 0.1). Conclusions: Improved survival was recorded within the high-risk BCR group for patients treated with early SRT compared with those under observation. Our results suggest recommending early SRT for high-risk BCR men. Conversely, surveillance might be suitable for low-risk BCR, since only nine patients with low-risk BCR died from prostate cancer during follow-up. Patient summary: The impact of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) on cancer-specific outcomes stratified according to the European Association of Urology biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk classification was assessed. While men with high-risk BCR should be offered SRT, surveillance might be a suitable option for those with low-risk BCR.

Source

Publisher

Elsevier B.V.

Keywords

Urology, Nephrology

Citation

Has Part

Source

European Urology

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1016/j.eururo.2023.05.038

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

N/A

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Goal

Thumbnail Image
GoalOpen Access

1

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details