<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Publication:
European Association of urology biochemical recurrence risk classification as a decision tool for salvage radiotherapy-a multicenter study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Departments

Item type:Organizational Unit,
Item type:Organizational Unit,

School / College / Institute

Item type:Organizational Unit,
Item type:Organizational Unit,
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU-Authors

Organization Authors

Co-Authors

Preisser, Felix

Abrams-Pompe, Raisa S.

Stelwagen, Piter Jan

Böhmer, Dirk

Zattoni, Fabio

Magli, Alessandro

Rivas, Juan Gómez

Dilme, Roser Vives

Sepulcri, Matteo

Eguibar, Aritz

Date

Language

Embargo Status

N/A

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Background: The European Association of Urology (EAU) has proposed a risk stratification for patients harboring biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Objective: To assess whether this risk stratification helps in choosing patients for salvage radiotherapy (SRT). Design, setting, and participants: Analyses of 2379 patients who developed BCR after RP (1989–2020), within ten European high-volume centers, were conducted. Early and late SRT were defined as SRT delivered at prostate-specific antigen values <0.5 and ≥0.5 ng/ml, respectively. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Multivariable Cox models tested the effect of SRT versus no SRT on death and cancer-specific death. The Simon-Makuch method tested for survival differences within each risk group. Results and limitations: Overall, 805 and 1574 patients were classified as having EAU low- and high-risk BCR. The median follow-up was 54 mo after BCR for survivors. For low-risk BCR, 12-yr overall survival was 87% versus 78% (p = 0.2) and cancer-specific survival was 100% versus 96% (p = 0.2) for early versus no SRT. For high-risk BCR, 12-yr overall survival was 81% versus 66% (p < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival was 98% versus 82% (p < 0.001) for early versus no SRT. In multivariable analyses, early SRT decreased the risk for death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55, p < 0.01) and cancer-specific death (HR: 0.08, p < 0.001). Late SRT was a predictor of cancer-specific death (HR: 0.17, p < 0.01) but not death (p = 0.1). Conclusions: Improved survival was recorded within the high-risk BCR group for patients treated with early SRT compared with those under observation. Our results suggest recommending early SRT for high-risk BCR men. Conversely, surveillance might be suitable for low-risk BCR, since only nine patients with low-risk BCR died from prostate cancer during follow-up. Patient summary: The impact of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) on cancer-specific outcomes stratified according to the European Association of Urology biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk classification was assessed. While men with high-risk BCR should be offered SRT, surveillance might be a suitable option for those with low-risk BCR.

Source

Publisher

Elsevier B.V.

Citation

item.page.haspartof

Source

European Urology

item.page.ispartofseries

item.page.edition

DOI

10.1016/j.eururo.2023.05.038

item.page.datauri

item.page.link

Rights

N/A

Copyrights Note

Rights and licensing

N/A

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Patent

Related Goal

Item type:Goal, Access status: Open Access ,
03 - Good Health and Well-being
Over the last 15 years, the number of childhood deaths has been cut in half. This proves that it is possible to win the fight against almost every disease. Still, we are spending an astonishing amount of money and resources on treating illnesses that are surprisingly easy to prevent. The new goal for worldwide Good Health promotes healthy lifestyles, preventive measures and modern, efficient healthcare for everyone.
Google Scholar
Scholar'da Ara ↗
Altmetric
Dimensions
PlumX Metrikleri
BIP! Indicators