Publication:
Uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among healthcare workers and the effect of nudging interventions: a mixed methods study

dc.contributor.departmentKUISCID (Koç University İşbank Center for Infectious Diseases)
dc.contributor.departmentGraduate School of Health Sciences
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Nursing
dc.contributor.kuauthorBeşer, Ayşe
dc.contributor.kuauthorErgönül, Önder
dc.contributor.kuauthorKayı, İlker
dc.contributor.kuauthorMadran, Bahar
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGRADUATE SCHOOL OF HEALTH SCIENCES
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteResearch Center
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF NURSING
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-19T10:32:55Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractBackground: During the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) has a critical role because of their high-risk exposure and being a role model. Therefore, we aimed to investigate vaccine hesitancy and the role of mandatory polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing and education for vaccine uptake.Methods: We conducted an explanatory sequential designed observational mixed-methods study, including quantitative and qualitative sections consecutively in two different pandemic hospitals between 15 September 2021 and 1 April 2022. The characteristics of vaccinated and unvaccinated HCWs were compared. The vaccine hesitancy scales were applied, and the effect of nudging, such as mandatory PCR and education, were evaluated. In-depth interviews were performed to investigate the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among HCWs according to Health Belief Model. Results: In total, 3940 HCWs were included. Vaccine hesitancy was more common among males than females, the ancillary workers than other health professions, and nonmedical departments than other departments. After the mandatory weekly PCR request nudge, 83.33 % (130/156) vaccine-hesitant HCWs were vaccinated, and 8.3 % (13/156) after the small group seminars and mandatory PCR every two days. The rate of COVID-19 vaccination was raised from 95.5 % to 99.67 % (3927/3940). At the end of in-depth interviews (n = 13), the vaccine hesitancy determinants were distrust, fear of uncertainty, immune confidence and spirituality, the media effect, social pressure, and obstinacy.Conclusions: The nudging interventions such as mandatory PCR testing and small group seminars helped raise the rate of COVID-19 vaccination; the most effective one is mandatory PCR.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue31
dc.description.openaccessGreen Published, Bronze
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume41
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.06.022
dc.identifier.eissn1873-2518
dc.identifier.issn0264-410X
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85162126053
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.06.022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/26506
dc.identifier.wos1058375800001
dc.keywordsCovid-19 pandemic
dc.keywordsHealthcare worker
dc.keywordsVaccine hesitancy
dc.keywordsVaccine intake
dc.keywordsQualitative analysis
dc.keywordsMixed methods
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofVaccine
dc.subjectImmunology
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleUptake of COVID-19 vaccines among healthcare workers and the effect of nudging interventions: a mixed methods study
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorKayı, İlker
local.contributor.kuauthorErgönül, Mehmet Önder
local.contributor.kuauthorBeşer, Ayşe
local.contributor.kuauthorMadran, Bahar
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF NURSING
local.publication.orgunit1GRADUATE SCHOOL OF HEALTH SCIENCES
local.publication.orgunit1Research Center
local.publication.orgunit2KUISCID (Koç University İşbank Center for Infectious Diseases)
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
local.publication.orgunit2School of Nursing
local.publication.orgunit2Graduate School of Health Sciences
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication09525e58-d4ea-4461-b2ec-f131e54c0771
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication2f870f28-12c9-4b28-9465-b91a69c1d48c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationcd883b5a-a59a-463b-9038-a0962a6b0749
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery09525e58-d4ea-4461-b2ec-f131e54c0771
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication4c75e0a5-ca7f-4443-bd78-1b473d4f6743
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublicationd437580f-9309-4ecb-864a-4af58309d287
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication9781feb6-cb81-4c13-aeb3-97dae2048412
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4c75e0a5-ca7f-4443-bd78-1b473d4f6743

Files