Publication: General linear formulations of stochastic dominance criteria
dc.contributor.coauthor | Kopa, Milos | |
dc.contributor.department | Graduate School of Business | |
dc.contributor.kuauthor | Post, Gerrit Tjeerd | |
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstitute | GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-09T23:39:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.description.abstract | We develop and implement linear formulations of general Nth order stochastic dominance criteria for discrete probability distributions. Our approach is based on a piece-wise polynomial representation of utility and its derivatives and can be implemented by solving a relatively small system of linear inequalities. This approach allows for comparing a given prospect with a discrete set of alternative prospects as well as for comparison with a polyhedral set of linear combinations of prospects. We also derive a linear dual formulation in terms of lower partial moments and co-lower partial moments. An empirical application to historical stock market data suggests that the passive stock market portfolio is highly inefficient relative to actively managed portfolios for all investment horizons and for nearly all investors. The results also illustrate that the mean-variance rule and second-order stochastic dominance rule may not detect market portfolio inefficiency because of non-trivial violations of non-satiation and prudence. | |
dc.description.indexedby | WOS | |
dc.description.indexedby | Scopus | |
dc.description.issue | 2 | |
dc.description.openaccess | NO | |
dc.description.publisherscope | International | |
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEu | N/A | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Czech Science Foundation [P402/12/G097] The research was partially supported by Czech Science Foundation (Grant P402/12/G097). We thank Turan Bali, Garry Barrett, Enrico De Giorgi, Haim Levy, Jack Meyer, Valerio Poti and Pim van Vliet for providing valuable comments and suggestions to this study. Any remaining errors are our own. | |
dc.description.volume | 230 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.04.015 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1872-6860 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0377-2217 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84878950027 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.04.015 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/13098 | |
dc.identifier.wos | 321085400012 | |
dc.keywords | Stochastic dominance | |
dc.keywords | Utility theory | |
dc.keywords | Non-satiation | |
dc.keywords | Risk aversion | |
dc.keywords | Prudence | |
dc.keywords | Temperance equity premium | |
dc.keywords | Preferences | |
dc.keywords | Efficiency | |
dc.keywords | Utility | |
dc.keywords | Tests | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Journal of Operational Research | |
dc.subject | Management | |
dc.subject | Operations research | |
dc.subject | Management science | |
dc.title | General linear formulations of stochastic dominance criteria | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
local.contributor.kuauthor | Post, Gerrit Tjeerd | |
local.publication.orgunit1 | GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS | |
local.publication.orgunit2 | Graduate School of Business | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 66c315a1-2b3d-40d3-89e4-aab9ae3b313b | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 66c315a1-2b3d-40d3-89e4-aab9ae3b313b | |
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication | eae8aa5b-4ed7-47c1-a210-5860cba53ef4 | |
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | eae8aa5b-4ed7-47c1-a210-5860cba53ef4 |