Publication:
ECG markers of positive drug challenge with ajmaline in patients with Brugada syndrome

dc.contributor.coauthorKruska, Mathieu
dc.contributor.coauthorWuerfel, Sara
dc.contributor.coauthorKohl, Maximilian
dc.contributor.coauthorLiebe, Volker
dc.contributor.coauthorAkin, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.coauthorKuschyk, Juergen
dc.contributor.coauthorDuerschmied, Daniel
dc.contributor.coauthorBorggrefe, Martin
dc.contributor.coauthorRudic, Boris
dc.contributor.departmentKUH (Koç University Hospital)
dc.contributor.kuauthorTülümen, Erol
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteKUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-16T08:45:53Z
dc.date.available2026-01-16
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractBackground Ajmaline challenge (AC) is used for diagnosing suspected Brugada syndrome (BS) in patients with unexplained syncope, survived cardiac arrest, or for family screening. Purpose To evaluate baseline ECG markers predicting a positive AC in the absence of a spontaneous diagnostic Brugada ECG. Methods Baseline ECGs of 221 consecutive patients undergoing AC (up to 1 mg/kg bodyweight) were analyzed. ECGs from positive and negative tests were compared, with Q-, R-, S-, J-, and T-wave amplitudes and intervals measured in all 12 leads. Results 221 patients underwent AC; the cohort was 71% male, and 7% had survived cardiac arrest. AC was positive in 93 patients (42%). Prominent S-waves in lead II and J-waves in V1 predicted a positive AC (S-wave duration: 36 vs. 22 ms, p < 0.01; J-wave amplitude V1: 0.06 vs. 0.01 mV, p < 0.001). ROC analysis confirmed discriminativae value for S-wave duration in lead II (AUC 0.79) and J-wave amplitude in V1 (AUC 0.71). A cut off of >= 19 ms for S-wave duration in lead II showed 96% sensitivity for a positive test (OR 17.3, p < 0.001). J-wave amplitude in V1 >= 0.05 mV was also significantly associated (OR 5.4, p < 0.001). Conclusion In patients without a spontaneous diagnostic Brugada ECG, prominent S-waves in lead II and J-waves in V1 are subtle electrical abnormalities that help identify patients and family members with a higher likelihood of positive AC.
dc.description.fulltextYes
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessGreen OA
dc.description.openaccessGold OA
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipHeidelberg University
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/anec.70137
dc.identifier.eissn1542-474X
dc.identifier.embargoNo
dc.identifier.issn1082-720X
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pubmed41355478
dc.identifier.quartileQ4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105024131556
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/anec.70137
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/32057
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.identifier.wos001633793400001
dc.keywordsAjmaline challenge
dc.keywordsBrugada syndrome
dc.keywordsECG markers
dc.keywordsProvocation testing
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
dc.relation.openaccessYes
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectCardiac and cardiovascular systems
dc.titleECG markers of positive drug challenge with ajmaline in patients with Brugada syndrome
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.familyNameTülümen
person.givenNameErol
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee

Files