Publication:
Clinical spectrum, outcomes, and risk factors of West Nile virus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Placeholder

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit
Organizational Unit
Organizational Unit

Program

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Editor & Affiliation

Compiler & Affiliation

Translator

Other Contributor

Date

Language

eng

Type

Embargo Status

No

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Background West Nile virus (WNV) infection has a broad and heterogeneous clinical spectrum, yet systematic syntheses focusing on clinically and laboratory-confirmed cases remain limited. Objectives To characterize the clinical spectrum reported in clinically recognized, laboratory-supported WNV cases, explore differences in symptom profiles according to plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) confirmation status, and summarize environmental risk factors described in the clinical literature. Method This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420250650535) and conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Results A total of 4062 patients with West Nile virus (WNV) infection from 39 published studies were analysed. Most patients were male (55%), with a mean age of 52. The pooled mortality proportion was 6.23%, increasing to 62% among intensive care unit patients. Central nervous system manifestations were the most frequent (39.39%), followed by systemic (31.21%) symptoms. Only 53% of reported cases were confirmed by PRNT, while the remaining cases were diagnosed using other laboratory-based methods. Cases without PRNT confirmation more often presented with nonspecific symptoms, whereas PRNT-confirmed cases showed a more consistent neurological profile. Conclusion West Nile virus infection is a multisystemic disease associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly in neuroinvasive cases. Improved recognition of symptom patterns may facilitate earlier diagnosis. Expanding access to confirmatory diagnostic and strengthening surveillance, especially in at-risk regions, is essential to reduce misclassification bias among clinically recognised WNV cases and improve public health preparedness.

Source

Publisher

Elsevier

Subject

Infectious diseases

Citation

Has Part

Source

International Journal of Infectious Diseases

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1016/j.ijid.2026.108476

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

N/A

Copyrights Note

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as N/A

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Goal

0

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details