Publication:
Embodiment of abstract categories in space ... grounding or mere compatibility effects? The case of politics

dc.contributor.coauthorFarias, Ana Rita
dc.contributor.coauthorGarrido, Margarida
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology
dc.contributor.kuauthorSemin, Gün Refik
dc.contributor.kuprofileResearcher
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:52:08Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractIn two experiments, the role played by stimulus response compatibility in driving the spatial grounding of abstract concepts is examined. In Experiment 1, participants were asked to classify politics-related words appearing to the left or the right side of a computer monitor as socialist or conservative. Responses were given by pressing vertically aligned keys and thus orthogonal to the spatial information that may have been implied by the words. Responses given by left or right index finger were counterbalanced. In Experiment 2, a lexical decision task, participants categorized political words or non-words presented to the left or the right auditory channels, by pressing the top/bottom button of a response box. The response category labels (word or non-word) were also orthogonal to the spatial information that may have been implied by the stimulus words. In both experiments, responses were faster when socialism-related words were presented on the left and conservatism-related words were presented on the right, irrespective of the reference of the response keys or labels. Overall, our findings suggest that the spatial grounding of abstract concepts (or at least politics-related ones) is independent of experimentally driven stimulus-response compatibility effects. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsorshipMarie Curie Career Integration Grant [FP7-PEOPLE-2013-CIG/631673]
dc.description.sponsorshipPortuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [SFRH/BD/60698/2009, PTDC/MHC-PCN/5217/2014, IF/00085/2013]
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/60698/2009] Funding Source: FCT This research reported here was in part supported by a Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (FP7-PEOPLE-2013-CIG/631673) awarded to the second author and by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology with grants awarded to the first (SFRH/BD/60698/2009), second (PTDC/MHC-PCN/5217/2014), and last authors (IF/00085/2013).
dc.description.volume166
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.03.002
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6297
dc.identifier.issn0001-6918
dc.identifier.quartileQ4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84962221743
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.03.002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/14808
dc.identifier.wos375737600007
dc.keywordsSpatial grounding
dc.keywordsAbstract concepts
dc.keywordsCompatibility effects
dc.keywordsPolitics
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.sourceActa Psychologica
dc.subjectPsychology, experimental
dc.titleEmbodiment of abstract categories in space ... grounding or mere compatibility effects? The case of politics
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0002-5304-5566
local.contributor.kuauthorSemin, Gün Refik
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd5fc0361-3a0a-4b96-bf2e-5cd6b2b0b08c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd5fc0361-3a0a-4b96-bf2e-5cd6b2b0b08c

Files