Publication:
Prognostic Significance of Tumor Budding in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast with Neuroendocrine Differentiation

dc.contributor.coauthorErginöz, Ergin (12763735000)
dc.contributor.coauthorCavus, Gokce Hande (57277200000)
dc.contributor.coauthorÖztürk, Tülin Kılıçaslan (35311771300)
dc.contributor.coauthorİlvan, Şennur (6603003841)
dc.contributor.coauthorKayadibi, Yasemin (55901832200)
dc.contributor.coauthorOzdil, Ayşenur (57226862557)
dc.contributor.coauthorZenger, Serkan (57202516070)
dc.contributor.coauthorVelidedeoǧlu, Mehmet (55964874300)
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-31T08:23:31Z
dc.date.available2025-12-31
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) with neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) is a rare subgroup of breast cancer that is treated the same way as invasive ductal carcinoma-no special type (IDC-NST). In this study, we aimed to study the effects of tumor budding on clinicopathological outcomes and survival. Methods: Fifty-seven patients previously diagnosed with breast cancer were included in this analysis. Patients were grouped into IDC-NST and IDC with NED using the neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin. Histological features were re-evaluated by two different pathologists in terms of tumor budding characteristics. Results: Patients diagnosed with IDC with NED tended to be older (62.9 ± 15.4 vs 51.7 ± 9.9; P = 0.02). Compared to IDC-NST, IDC with NED group tended to display type A and B mammographic breast composition (P = 0.018), have higher tumor budding (2.7 vs 2, P = 0.009), larger in diameter (3.9 ± 2.3 cm vs 2.5 ± 1.5 cm; P = 0.015), and show higher lymphatic invasion (P = 0.017), vascular invasion (P = 0.042), and perineural invasion (P = 0.045). However, no differences were found in the 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival between the two groups. Conclusion: Compared to IDC-NST, IDC with NED exhibited higher levels of tumor budding, were typically larger, and displayed higher lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, and perineural invasion. © The Author(s) 2025
dc.description.fulltextYes
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/10668969251391355
dc.identifier.embargoNo
dc.identifier.issn1066-8969
dc.identifier.pubmed41232117
dc.identifier.quartileN/A
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105021965655
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/10668969251391355
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/31735
dc.keywordsbreast cancer
dc.keywordsinvasive ductal carcinoma
dc.keywordsneuroendocrine differentiation
dc.keywordstumor budding
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Inc.
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Surgical Pathology
dc.relation.openaccessYes
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titlePrognostic Significance of Tumor Budding in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast with Neuroendocrine Differentiation
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files