Publication:
Neoadjuvant intermediate-course versus long-course chemoradiotherapy in T3-4/N0+ rectal cancer: Istanbul R-02 phase II randomized study

dc.contributor.coauthorSaglam, Sezer
dc.contributor.coauthorSaglam, Esra Kaytan
dc.contributor.coauthorYanar, Hakan
dc.contributor.coauthorGok, Kaan
dc.contributor.coauthorTastekin, Didem
dc.contributor.coauthorAkbas, Canan Koksal
dc.contributor.coauthorSakin, Nergiz Dagoglu
dc.contributor.coauthorKartal, Gulbiz Dagoglu
dc.contributor.coauthorKeskin, Metin
dc.contributor.coauthorSanli, Yasemin
dc.contributor.coauthorGulluoglu, Mine
dc.contributor.coauthorAkgun, Zuleyha
dc.contributor.kuauthorŞenyürek, Şükran
dc.contributor.kuauthorBalık, Emre
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.unitKoç University Hospital
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-29T09:40:29Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractRadiation therapy (RT) is typically applied using one of two standard approaches for preoperative treatment of resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): short-course RT (SC-RT) alone or long-course RT (LC-RT) with concurrent fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The Phase II single-arm KROG 11-02 study using intermediate-course (IC) (33 Gy (Gray)/10 fr (fraction) with concurrent capecitabine) preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) demonstrated a pathologically complete response rate and a sphincter-sparing rate that were close to those of LC-CRT. The current trial aim to compare the pathological/oncological outcomes, toxicity, and quality of life results of LC-CRT and IC-CRT in cases of LARC. The prescribed dose was 33 Gy/10 fr for the IC-CRT group and 50.4 Gy/28 fr for the LC-CRT group. Concurrent chronomodulated capecitabine (Brunch regimen) 1650 mg/m2/daily chemotherapy treatment was applied in both groups. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Colorectal Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-CR29) was administered at baseline and at three and six months after CRT. A total of 60 patients with LARC randomized to receive IC-CRT (n = 30) or LC-CRT (n = 30) were included in this phase II randomized trial. No significant difference was noted between groups in terms of pathological outcomes, including pathological response rates (ypT0N0-complete response: 23.3% vs. 16.7%, respectively, and ypT0-2N0downstaging: 50% for each; p = 0.809) and Dworak score-based pathological tumor regression grade (Grade 4-complete response: 23.3 vs. 16.7%, p = 0.839). The 5-year overall survival (73.3 vs. 86.7%, p = 0.173) rate was also similar. The acute radiation dermatitis (p < 0.001) and any hematological toxicity (p = 0.004) rates were significantly higher in the LC-CRT group, while no significant difference was noted between treatment groups in terms of baseline, third month, and sixth month EORTC QLQ-CR29 scores.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue5
dc.description.openaccessGreen Published, hybrid
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.volume31
dc.identifier.doi10.32604/or.2023.030351
dc.identifier.eissn1555-3906
dc.identifier.issn0965-0407
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85166270594
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32604/or.2023.030351
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/23348
dc.identifier.wos1062176300006
dc.keywordsChemoradiotherapy
dc.keywordsRectal cancer
dc.keywordsNeoadjuvant therapy
dc.languageen
dc.publisherTech Science Press
dc.sourceOncology Research
dc.subjectOncology
dc.titleNeoadjuvant intermediate-course versus long-course chemoradiotherapy in T3-4/N0+ rectal cancer: Istanbul R-02 phase II randomized study
dc.typeJournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorŞenyürek, Şükran
local.contributor.kuauthorBalık, Emre

Files