Publication:
Comparison between difference-frequency generation and parametric fluorescence in quasi-phase-matched lithium niobate stripe waveguides

dc.contributor.coauthorBaldi, P.
dc.contributor.coauthorEl Hadi, K.
dc.contributor.coauthorDe Micheli, M. P.
dc.contributor.coauthorOstrowsky, D.B.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Physics
dc.contributor.kuauthorSundheimer, Michael
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Physics
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Sciences
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-10T00:09:16Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.description.abstractTuning curves and gain are two relevant parameters for integrated optical parametric oscillators. We show in this paper that they can be determined with a good precision without building a high-finesse cavity by measurement of the optical parametric fluorescence and difference-frequency generation. In the first part of this paper, we compare theoretically the guided optical parametric fluorescence and the guided difference-Frequency generation in the quasi-phase matching configuration. In the second part, we compare experimental results on optical parametric fluorescence in the 1.2-2.2-μm region and optical difference-frequency generation from a 1.55-μm laser diode using a pump wavelength between 775-795 nm in quasi-phase-matched lithium niobate stripe waveguides. This comparison shows that the gain measured by both methods is identical, but, while parametric fluorescence allows us to obtain the quasi-phase-matching curve, the difference-frequency generation gives a simpler and more accurate measurement of the gain. The combination of these two techniques provides therefore a powerful tool for evaluating the different fabrication processes of the nonlinear waveguides, without actually fabricating a parametric oscillator.
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.volume2
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/2944.577399
dc.identifier.issn1077-260X
dc.identifier.linkhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0030156097anddoi=10.1109%2f2944.577399andpartnerID=40andmd5=ba615d93aa12cba0fad4406265973d06
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0030156097
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2944.577399
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/17090
dc.keywordsFluorescence
dc.keywordsGain measurement
dc.keywordsMathematical models
dc.keywordsOptical variables measurement
dc.keywordsOptical waveguides
dc.keywordsSemiconductor lasers
dc.keywordsDifference frequency generation
dc.keywordsLithium niobate strip waveguides
dc.keywordsNonlinear waveguides
dc.keywordsOptical parametric fluorescence
dc.keywordsQuasi phase matching
dc.keywordsNonlinear optics
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherIEEE
dc.sourceIEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics
dc.subjectPhysics
dc.titleComparison between difference-frequency generation and parametric fluorescence in quasi-phase-matched lithium niobate stripe waveguides
dc.typeReview
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authoridN/A
local.contributor.kuauthorSundheimer, Michael
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationc43d21f0-ae67-4f18-a338-bcaedd4b72a4
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc43d21f0-ae67-4f18-a338-bcaedd4b72a4

Files