<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Publication:
Lessons learned: quality qnalysis of optical coherence tomography in neuromyelitis optica

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Departments

Item type:Organizational Unit,

School / College / Institute

Item type:Organizational Unit,
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

Organization Authors

Co-Authors

Salih, Hadi

Samadzadeh, Sara

Bereuter, Charlotte

Motamedi, Seyedamirhosein

Chien, Claudia

Villoslada, Pablo

Stiebel-kalish, Hadas

Asgari, Nasrin

Mao-draayer, Yang

Ringelstein, Marius

Date

Language

Embargo Status

No

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Introduction Optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived retina measurements are markers for neuroaxonal visual pathway status. High-quality OCT scans are essential for reliable measurements, but their acquisition is particularly challenging in eyes with severe visual impairment, as often observed in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD).Objective To investigate OCT quality issues in real-world data from the international Collaborative Retrospective Study on Retinal OCT in Neuromyelitis Optica (CROCTINO).Methods We evaluated the quality of peripapillary and macular OCT scans, using Heidelberg Spectralis SD-OCT, Carl Zeiss Cirrus HD-OCT, or Topcon SD-OCT across 22 centers. Experienced graders applied OSCAR-IB criteria for OCT quality. Eyes were classified as severely visually impaired or not based on a 1.0 logMAR cut-off. Quality outcomes were compared using the Chi-square test.Results A total of 3075 OCT scans (1630 peripapillary, 1445 macular) from 539 people with NMOSD and related conditions were evaluated. Macular scans were rejected more often than peripapillary scans due to quality issues (20.1% vs. 14.5%, p < 0.001). Rejection rates were higher in eyes with severe visual impairment (peripapillary: 28.9%, macular: 41.6%) compared to eyes without severe visual impairment (peripapillary: 10.7%, p < 0.001; macular: 14.6%, p < 0.001).Conclusion Our study revealed that approximately one in six scans was rejected due to low quality, with higher rejection rates in eyes with severe visual impairment. As scan quality can bias quantitative outcomes and artificial intelligence applications, these findings emphasize the unmet need for standardized OCT practices tailored to NMOSD and other conditions involving severe visual impairment.

Source

Publisher

Wiley

Citation

item.page.haspartof

Source

Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology

item.page.ispartofseries

item.page.edition

DOI

10.1002/acn3.70235

item.page.datauri

item.page.link

Rights

Copyrighted

Copyrights Note

Rights and licensing

Copyrighted

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Patent

Related Goal

Google Scholar
Scholar'da Ara ↗
0
Görüntülenme
8
İndirme
Altmetric
Dimensions
PlumX Metrikleri
BIP! Indicators