Publication:
Vestibular schwannoma Koos grade I international study of active surveillance versus stereotactic radiosurgery: the VISAS-K1 study

Placeholder

Departments

Organizational Unit

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Bin-Alamer,Othman
Abou-Al-Shaar,Hussam
Pelcher,Isabelle
Begley,Sabrina
Goenka,Anuj
Schulder,Michael
Tourigny,Jean-Nicolas
Mathieu,David
Hamel,Andreanne
Briggs,Robert G.

Publication Date

Language

Embargo Status

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This investigation evaluates the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) vs observation for Koos grade I vestibular schwannomas (VS). METHODS: In a multicenter study, we retrospectively analyzed data of patients with Koos grade I VS who underwent SRS (SRS group) or were observed (observation group). Propensity score matching was used to equilibrate demographics, tumor size, and audiometric data across groups. The outcome analyzed included tumor control, preservation of serviceable hearing, and neurological function. RESULTS: The study matched 142 patients, providing a median follow-up period of 36 months. SRS significantly enhanced tumor control compared with observation, with a 100% control rate at both 5- and 8-year marks in the SRS group vs 48.6% and 29.5% in the observation group at the same time intervals, respectively (P < .001). Preservation of serviceable hearing outcomes between groups showed no significant difference at 5 and 8 years, ensuring a comparable quality of auditory function (SRS 70.1% vs observation 53.4% at 5 years;P = .33). Furthermore, SRS was associated with a reduced likelihood of tinnitus (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, P = .04), vestibular dysfunction (OR = 0.17, P = .002), and overall cranial nerve dysfunction (OR = 0.49, P = .03) at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: SRS management of patients with Koos grade I VS was associated with superior tumor control and reduced odds for cranial nerve dysfunction, while not compromising hearing preservation compared with observation. These findings support the safety and efficacy of SRS as a primary care approach for this patient population.

Source

Publisher

Lippincott Williams and Wilkins

Subject

Clinical neurology, Surgery

Citation

Has Part

Source

Neurosurgery

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1227/neu.0000000000003215

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

2

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details