Publication:
Multimodal assessment after total neoadjuvant therapy versus standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer accurately predicts complete responders

dc.contributor.coauthorGürbüz, Bülent
dc.contributor.kuauthorÖzoran, Emre
dc.contributor.kuauthorÖzata, İbrahim Halil
dc.contributor.kuauthorUymaz, Derya Salim
dc.contributor.kuauthorOmarov, Nail
dc.contributor.kuauthorBozkurt, Emre
dc.contributor.kuauthorTüfekçi, Tutku
dc.contributor.kuauthorKarahan, Salih Nafiz
dc.contributor.kuauthorSelçukbiricik, Fatih
dc.contributor.kuauthorBölükbaşı, Yasemin
dc.contributor.kuauthorTaşkın, Orhun Çığ
dc.contributor.kuauthorGürses, Bengi
dc.contributor.kuauthorRencüzoğulları, Ahmet
dc.contributor.kuauthorBuğra, Dursun
dc.contributor.kuauthorBalık, Emre
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.unitKoç University Hospital
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-29T09:38:00Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractPurpose This study aimed to compare local regrowth rates after total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) versus standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (SNCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients that were strictly selected and assessed with a multimodal approach. Secondary outcomes were 4-year disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates.Methods Locally advanced rectal cancer patients without distant metastases treated at Koc Healthcare Group between January 2014 and January 2021 were included. Patients were assessed for complete response with a combination of digital rectal exam, endoscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging with a dedicated rectum protocol. The systemic evaluation was performed with an upper abdomen MRI using intravenous hepatobiliary contrast agent and a thorax CT.Results Of the 270 patients with LARC, 182 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Ninety-seven (53.3%) underwent TNT, while 85 (46.7%) underwent SNCRT. A cumulative combination of pathological and sustained clinical complete response was significantly higher in the TNT group than in the SNCRT (45.4% vs. 20.0%, p < 0.0001). After a median follow-up of 48 months, seven patients in the W & W group had regrowth [TNT: 4 (10.8%) vs. SNCRT: 3 (23.1%), p = 0.357]. Based on pathological examination, complete/near complete mesorectum rates (p = 1.000) and circumferential resection margin positivity rates (p = 1.000) were similar between the groups. The 4-year DFS and OS rates were comparable. The patients with clinical or pathological complete response had significantly longer overall survival (p = 0.017) regardless of the type of neoadjuvant treatment.Conclusions Multimodal assessment after TNT effectively detects complete responders, resulting in low local recurrence and increased cumulative complete response rates. However, these outcomes did not translate into a survival advantage.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsorsThe authors would like to thank Gina Brown for final critical review of the manuscript before submission.
dc.description.volume38
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00384-023-04526-2
dc.identifier.eissn1432-1262
dc.identifier.issn0179-1958
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85171232463
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-023-04526-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/22553
dc.identifier.wos1067105700002
dc.keywordsTotal neoadjuvant therapy
dc.keywordsStandard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
dc.keywordsRectal cancer
dc.keywordsInduction chemotherapy
dc.keywordsConsolidation chemotherapy
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.grantnoThe authors would like to thank Gina Brown for final critical review of the manuscript before submission.
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease
dc.subjectGastroenterology and hepatology
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleMultimodal assessment after total neoadjuvant therapy versus standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer accurately predicts complete responders
dc.typeConference proceeding
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorÖzoran, Emre
local.contributor.kuauthorÖzata, İbrahim Halil
local.contributor.kuauthorUymaz, Derya Salim
local.contributor.kuauthorOmarov, Nail
local.contributor.kuauthorBozkurt, Emre
local.contributor.kuauthorTüfekçi, Tutku
local.contributor.kuauthorKarahan, Salih Nafiz
local.contributor.kuauthorSelçukbiricik, Fatih
local.contributor.kuauthorBölükbaşı, Yasemin
local.contributor.kuauthorTaşkın, Orhun Çığ
local.contributor.kuauthorGürses, Bengi
local.contributor.kuauthorRencüzoğulları, Ahmet
local.contributor.kuauthorBuğra, Dursun
local.contributor.kuauthorBalık, Emre

Files