Publication:
Is there a survival processing efect in metacognition?

dc.contributor.coauthorAlper
dc.contributor.coauthorAkcay,
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Media and Visual Arts
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Media and Visual Arts
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology
dc.contributor.kuauthorÇabuk, Dilan
dc.contributor.kuauthorYelimlieş, Alper
dc.contributor.kuauthorEskenazi, Terry
dc.contributor.kuprofileTeaching Faculty
dc.contributor.kuprofileUndergraduate Student
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.contributor.yokid258780
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:21:46Z
dc.description.abstractMemory systems serve an adaptive function for the fitness of organisms. A good example of this is the Survival Processing Effect (SPE) which points to increased retention of information when it is processed in a survival context compared to other contexts. Survival processing may also affect metacognitive processes, by increasing confidence judgments as well as increasing metacognitive sensitivity. No previous study, however, has directly examined whether processing information for survival also has an effect on metacognitive processes. Here we ask whether SPE extends to the metacognitive system in terms of both metacognitive sensitivity and confidence bias. In Experiment 1 participants were asked to rate a list of words in terms of relevance in a survival scenario or a moving scenario. In a surprise old/new recognition test, they were given one word at a time and asked to indicate if they have rated the presented word before and state how confident they are in that choice. Surprisingly, the results did not reveal a SPE, which may have been due to high overall performance in the recognition task. In Experiment 2 we increased the level of difficulty of the memory task, which resulted in a robust SPE, but could not find this effect in metacognitive monitoring. Together, these results suggest that survival processing may not affect metacognitive processes in a reliable fashion.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00426-022-01782-9
dc.identifier.eissn1430-2772
dc.identifier.issn0340-0727
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85145233550
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01782-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/10952
dc.identifier.wos905883700001
dc.keywordsAdaptive memory
dc.keywordsFalse memories
dc.keywordsError management
dc.keywordsConfidence
dc.keywordsAbility
dc.keywordsEvents
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelberg
dc.sourcePsychological Research-Psychologische Forschung
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectExperimental
dc.titleIs there a survival processing efect in metacognition?
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authoridN/A
local.contributor.authorid0000-0003-2319-6141
local.contributor.authorid0000-0001-6777-0753
local.contributor.kuauthorÇabuk, Dilan
local.contributor.kuauthorYelimlieş, Alper
local.contributor.kuauthorEskenazi, Terry
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication483fa792-2b89-4020-9073-eb4f497ee3fd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd5fc0361-3a0a-4b96-bf2e-5cd6b2b0b08c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery483fa792-2b89-4020-9073-eb4f497ee3fd

Files