Publication:
Trapezius port placement in patients with breast cancer: Long-term follow-up and quality-of-life assessment

dc.contributor.coauthorOcal, Osman
dc.contributor.coauthorEldem, Fatma Gonca
dc.contributor.coauthorPeynircioglu, Bora
dc.contributor.coauthorBalkanci, Ferhun
dc.contributor.departmentKUH (Koç University Hospital)
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorÇil, Barbaros Erhan
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteKUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-10T00:05:08Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the long-term results of and patient satisfaction with trapezius ports in breast cancer patients, as an alternative to chest ports. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent trapezius port placement from December 2007 to January 2017. Seventy female patients with breast cancer, with a mean age of 54 +/- 9.9 years (range, 29-76 years), were included. Indications for trapezius implantation were bilateral breast surgery or unilateral breast surgery and contralateral breast involvement. Sixty-eight of 70 patients had long-term follow-up. A retrospective, questionnaire-based survey was conducted to assess satisfaction and the trapezius port's effect on the daily life of the patient. Results: All implantations were technically successful. Total catheter service time for 68 patients was 65,952 days (2 patients were lost to follow-up). Mean catheter service time was 969.8 days (range 7-3,458 days; median 570 days; 95% confidence interval, 739-1199; standard deviation, 947.7). No immediate procedural complications occurred. Port complications developed in 4 patients (5.9%); port infection developed in 2 patients (0.03/1,000 days); skin dehiscence developed in 1 patient (0.02/1,000 days); and port malfunction developed in 1 patient (0.02/1,000 days). The overall infection rate was 2.9% (2/68). All patients (n = 44) or a close relative (n = 17) who were interviewed with a phone call reported satisfaction regarding their ports. Conclusions: Trapezius ports offer a safe and feasible option to patients with breast cancer who need an alternative site to chest ports. It is also associated with high overall patient satisfaction.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume30
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jvir.2018.08.011
dc.identifier.eissn1535-7732
dc.identifier.issn1051-0443
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85057628860
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2018.08.011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/16372
dc.identifier.wos455563300012
dc.keywordsVenous access ports
dc.keywordsComplications
dc.keywordsImplantation
dc.keywordsChest
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.subjectNuclear medicine
dc.subjectMedical imaging
dc.subjectPeripheral vascular disease
dc.titleTrapezius port placement in patients with breast cancer: Long-term follow-up and quality-of-life assessment
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorÇil, Barbaros Erhan
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit1KUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
local.publication.orgunit2KUH (Koç University Hospital)
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee

Files