Publication:
Systemic disease in leukocytoclastic vasculitis: a focus on direct immunofluorescence findings

dc.contributor.coauthorKoku Aksu, A.E.
dc.contributor.coauthorLeblebici, C.
dc.contributor.coauthorErdemir, V.A.
dc.contributor.coauthorErdem, O.
dc.contributor.coauthorBal Avcı, E,.
dc.contributor.coauthorGürel, M.S.
dc.contributor.kuauthorErtekin, Sümeyre Seda
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T13:13:51Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractBackground: direct immunofluorescence (DIF) panels are usually ordered for clinically suspected cutaneous vasculitis, but their positivity rate is variable, and their prognostic significance is not clear to date. Objective: the study aims to investigate the systemic involvement rate in leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) patients and the potential clinical and laboratory associations with systemic involvement, including DIF findings. Methods: a retrospective study of patients with histopathologically proven cutaneous LCV examined in the dermatology department between 2013 and 2017 was performed. Results: Of the 81 patients (mean age, 50.6 years), 42 (52%) were male. The mean time between the appearance of skin lesions and biopsy was 23.1 days, ranging from 2 to 180 days. DIF showed overall positivity of 90.1%, and C3 was the most frequent immunoreactant (82.7%). Any kind of extracutaneous involvement was present in 47 (58%) of patients, with renal involvement being the most frequent (53.1%), followed by articular (18.5%) and gastrointestinal (11.1%) involvement. The presence of renal disease was associated with the detection of IgG in the lesional skin (p = 0.017), and with the absence of IgM in the lesional skin (p = 0.032). There was a significant association between C3 deposition and joint involvement (p = 0.05). Study limitations: this is a single-center study with a retrospective design. Conclusion: DIF seems to be a useful ancillary diagnostic tool in the evaluation of cutaneous vasculitis, but the relationship between DIF findings and systemic involvement needs to be further elucidated due to contradictory data in the current literature.
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipN/A
dc.description.versionPublisher version
dc.description.volume98
dc.formatpdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.abd.2021.11.009
dc.identifier.eissn1806-4841
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR04065
dc.identifier.issn0365-0596
dc.identifier.linkhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.abd.2021.11.009
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85141499991
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/2954
dc.identifier.wos925558200001
dc.keywordsFluorescent antibody technique, direct
dc.keywordsImmunoglobulin G
dc.keywordsImmunoglobulin M
dc.keywordsSystemic vasculitis
dc.keywordsVasculitis, leukocytoclastic, cutaneous
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.grantnoNA
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/10949
dc.sourceAnais Brasileiros de Dermatologia
dc.subjectDermatology
dc.titleSystemic disease in leukocytoclastic vasculitis: a focus on direct immunofluorescence findings
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorErtekin, Sümeyre Seda

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10949.pdf
Size:
668.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format