Publication:
Modeling miniaturized piezoelectric ultrasound transducers: comparison of lumped and finite element models

dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentGraduate School of Sciences and Engineering
dc.contributor.kuauthorFaculty Member, Beker, Levent
dc.contributor.kuauthorMaster Student, Kullukçu, Berkay
dc.contributor.kuauthorPhD Student, Ziarati, Pouriya Torkinejad
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Engineering
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGRADUATE SCHOOL OF SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T22:51:15Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractIn the quest to develop wirelessly-powered implantable medical devices (IMD), ultrasonic power transfer has received significant attention due to its distinct advantages (sub-mm wavelength, lower attenuation, higher allowed power intensity by the FDA) compared to other alternatives such as radio frequency-based approaches. A typical power link structure for US-based IMDs consists of a piezoelectric cube (PC) and an easy to use modeling technique would provide value insights for design of such wireless power systems. Equivalent circuit modeling (ECM) is the most common method utilized to model piezoelectric acoustic devices. In this work, a detailed analysis of two commonly used ECM models, KLM and Leach are developed specifically for a PC resonator. Then, a 3D finite element model is developed and the results of the developed ECM are compared with the finite element model results for a PC as well as other aspect ratios of the transducer. The two ECM models yielded similar results with a difference of less than 0.5%. The Leach model does not utilize frequency-dependent elements, its implementation in conventional circuit analysis software is more straightforward. Through ECM, the effect of each design parameter on transducer characteristics could be determined. However, to achieve more accurate results as the aspect ratio converges to one, the use FEM or experimental data to perform modification on ECM is necessary.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuEU - TÜBİTAK
dc.description.sponsorshipTUBITAK 2232 program
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commission Marie Curie Actions fellowships Authors would like to thank to TUBITAK 2232 program and European Commission Marie Curie Actions fellowships for the funding support.
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-7281-5448-0
dc.identifier.issn1948-5719
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85097887372
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/6816
dc.identifier.wos635688900416
dc.keywordsEquivalent circuit modeling
dc.keywordsUltrasound power transfer
dc.keywordsImplantable medical devices
dc.keywordsPiezoelectric transducer
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIeee
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)
dc.subjectElectrical electronics engineering
dc.titleModeling miniaturized piezoelectric ultrasound transducers: comparison of lumped and finite element models
dc.typeConference Proceeding
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorZiarati, Pouriya Torkinejad
local.contributor.kuauthorKullukçu, Berkay
local.contributor.kuauthorBeker, Levent
local.publication.orgunit1College of Engineering
local.publication.orgunit1GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING
local.publication.orgunit2Department of Mechanical Engineering
local.publication.orgunit2Graduate School of Sciences and Engineering
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationba2836f3-206d-4724-918c-f598f0086a36
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3fc31c89-e803-4eb1-af6b-6258bc42c3d8
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryba2836f3-206d-4724-918c-f598f0086a36
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication8e756b23-2d4a-4ce8-b1b3-62c794a8c164
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication434c9663-2b11-4e66-9399-c863e2ebae43
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8e756b23-2d4a-4ce8-b1b3-62c794a8c164

Files