Publication:
Should we review our prophylaxis approach for increased antibiotic resistance in transrectal prostate biopsy?

dc.contributor.coauthorAltunsoy, Adalet
dc.contributor.coauthorCoser, Seref
dc.contributor.coauthorKemirtlek, Nizamettin
dc.contributor.coauthorBalci, Melih
dc.contributor.coauthorBodur, Hurrem
dc.contributor.coauthorTuncel, Altug
dc.contributor.departmentKUH (Koç University Hospital)
dc.contributor.kuauthorAykanat, İbrahim Can
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteKUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-29T09:40:16Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study aims to show the bacteriologic picture of acute prostatitis and bacteremia caused by infective agent after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSBx) and to determine the resistance rates of the infections in patients undergoing transrectal biopsy and to guide prophylaxis approach before biopsy. Methodology: The retrospective data of 935 patients who underwent TRUSBx between January 2010 to January 2019 were reviewed. Prebiopsy urine cultures and antimicrobial susceptibility were obtained. Subsequently, patients admitted to the hospital with any complaint after biopsy were examined for severe infection complications. Results: Of the 430 (61.7%) patients who underwent urine culture before the procedure, 45 (10.5%) had growth; 30 (66.7%) of the growing microorganisms were Escherichia coli . Twenty (44.4%) of all Gram -negative agents in pre-biopsy urine culture were susceptible to quinolone. Post TRUSBx bacteremia was present in 18.2%, urinary system infection in 83.6%, and hospitalization in 61.8% of 55 patients who were admitted to the hospital. In the isolated gram -negative microorganisms, fluoroquinolones resistance in urinary system infections was seen in 40% and bacteremia was seen in 70% of the cases. ESBL-producing Gram -negative bacteria were determined in 40% of infections in blood and 38.5% of urinary system infections in the post biopsy period in the current study. Conclusions: These high antibiotic resistance rates suggest that we better review our pre-procedure prophylaxis approaches.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.openaccessgold
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume18
dc.identifier.doi10.3855/jidc.18209
dc.identifier.issn1972-2680
dc.identifier.quartileQ4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85192928490
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.18209
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/23283
dc.identifier.wos1250407300014
dc.keywordsAntibiotic resistance
dc.keywordsFluoroquinolone
dc.keywordsProphylaxis
dc.keywordsProstate biopsy
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherThe Journal of Infection in Developing Countries (JIDC)
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Infection in Developing Countries
dc.subjectInfectious diseases
dc.titleShould we review our prophylaxis approach for increased antibiotic resistance in transrectal prostate biopsy?
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorAykanat, İbrahim Can
local.publication.orgunit1KUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
local.publication.orgunit2KUH (Koç University Hospital)
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IR04739.pdf
Size:
463.87 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format